[GIT PULL FOR v3.9] separate Montage ts2020 from ds3000 and rs2000, support for new TeVii cards

2012-12-24 Thread Igor M. Liplianin
The following changes since commit 8b2aea7878f64814544d0527c659011949d52358: [media] em28xx: prefer bulk mode on webcams (2012-12-23 17:24:30 -0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.linuxtv.org/liplianin/media_tree.git ts2020_v3.9 for you to fetch changes up to

Re: [v3.8-rc1] Multimedia regression, ioctl(17,..)-API changed ?

2012-12-24 Thread Jörg Otte
Yes it works, incl. usb-camera. I am now at: 637704cbc95c02d18741b4a6e7a5d2397f8b28ce Merge branch 'i2c-embedded/for-next' of git://git.pengutronix.de/git/wsa/linux Thanks, Jörg 2012/12/23 Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org: Jörg - does current git work for you? It has a patch from

Re: [v3.8-rc1] Multimedia regression, ioctl(17,..)-API changed ?

2012-12-24 Thread Jörg Otte
2012/12/23 Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com: Hi Jörg, Em Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:46:07 +0100 Jörg Otte jrg.o...@gmail.com escreveu: With kernel v3.8 all multimedia programs under KDE4 don't work (Kubuntu 12.04). They alltogether ( at least Dragonplayer (Mediaplayer), Knotify4

Re: [RFC/PATCH] v4l2-compliance: Reject invalid ioctl error codes

2012-12-24 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sun December 23 2012 23:24:04 Laurent Pinchart wrote: The recent uvcvideo regression that broke pulseaudio/KDE (see commit 9c016d61097cc39427a2f5025bdd97ac633d26a6 in the mainline kernel) was caused by the uvcvideo driver returning a -ENOENT error code to userspace by mistake. To make

Re: Patch update notification: 37 patches updated

2012-12-24 Thread Frank Schäfer
Am 23.12.2012 15:57, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: Em Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:45:31 +0100 Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu: Hi Mauro, Am 23.12.2012 01:08, schrieb Patchwork: Hello, The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork: * [3/6] em28xx:

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] em28xx: respect the message size constraints for i2c transfers

2012-12-24 Thread Frank Schäfer
Am 23.12.2012 15:46, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: Em Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:58:12 +0100 Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu: Am 23.12.2012 01:07, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: Em Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:23:28 +0100 Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu: The em2800

em28xx: module parameter prefer_bulk ?

2012-12-24 Thread Frank Schäfer
Hi Mauro, now that we prefer bulk transfers for webcams and isoc transfers for TV, I wonder if prefer_bulk is still a good name for this module parameter. What about something like 'usb_mode', 'usb_xfer_mode' or 'frame_xfer_mode' with 0=auto, 1=prefer isoc, 2=prefer bulk ? Regards, Frank -- To

[PATCH] v4l2-compliance: Print invalid return codes in control tests

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com --- utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp index

Re: [PATCH 1/6] uvcvideo: Set error_idx properly for extended controls API failures

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Hans, On Thursday 27 September 2012 17:16:15 Laurent Pinchart wrote: When one of the requested controls doesn't exist the error_idx field must reflect that situation. For G_EXT_CTRLS and S_EXT_CTRLS, error_idx must be set to the control count. For TRY_EXT_CTRLS, it must be set to the index

Re: [RFC/PATCH] v4l2-compliance: Reject invalid ioctl error codes

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Hans, On Monday 24 December 2012 10:24:48 Hans Verkuil wrote: On Sun December 23 2012 23:24:04 Laurent Pinchart wrote: The recent uvcvideo regression that broke pulseaudio/KDE (see commit 9c016d61097cc39427a2f5025bdd97ac633d26a6 in the mainline kernel) was caused by the uvcvideo driver

[PATCH v2 1/2] v4l2-compliance: Print invalid return codes in control tests

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com --- utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp | 16 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp

[PATCH v2 2/2] v4l2-compliance: Print invalid error_idx values in control tests

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com --- utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp index

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Vikas, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Vikas, Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so delays should be much shorter. On Thursday 06 December 2012 10:51:15 Vikas Sajjan wrote:

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Dave, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 15:04:02 Dave Airlie wrote: Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular order) Tomi Valkeinen for all the time he spend helping me to draft v2,

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote: Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:30:00 Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote: The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and v4l drivers that are shared with the drm codebase, really just implement fbdev

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Inki, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 18:38:31 Inki Dae wrote: 2012/12/18 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote: The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and v4l drivers that are shared with the drm

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomasz, On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote: On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote: On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Vikas, Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so delays should be much

Re: Patch update notification: 37 patches updated

2012-12-24 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:56:22 +0100 Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu: Am 23.12.2012 15:57, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: Em Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:45:31 +0100 Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu: Hi Mauro, Am 23.12.2012 01:08, schrieb Patchwork:

Re: em28xx: module parameter prefer_bulk ?

2012-12-24 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:25:38 +0100 Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu: Hi Mauro, now that we prefer bulk transfers for webcams and isoc transfers for TV, I wonder if prefer_bulk is still a good name for this module parameter. What about something like 'usb_mode',

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marcus, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:39:11 Marcus Lorentzon wrote: On 12/18/2012 06:04 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular order) Tomi Valkeinen

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sylwester, On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:59:35 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: On 12/18/2012 07:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlieairl...@gmail.com wrote: So this might be a bit off topic but this whole CDF triggered me looking at stuff I generally avoid:

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jani, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi and I have talked about it like 2-3 years ago

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 17:07:50 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 2012-12-19 16:57, Jani Nikula wrote: It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be overengineering it. They are pretty well

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Wednesday 19 December 2012 09:26:40 Rob Clark wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote: I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] Common Display Framework

2012-12-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, (CC'ing Hans Verkuil) On Wednesday 19 December 2012 10:05:27 Rob Clark wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote: And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over i2c) that can also be shared between

cron job: media_tree daily build: WARNINGS

2012-12-24 Thread Hans Verkuil
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds media_tree for the kernels and architectures in the list below. Results of the daily build of media_tree: date:Mon Dec 24 19:00:24 CET 2012 git hash:8b2aea7878f64814544d0527c659011949d52358 gcc version: i686-linux-gcc