Re: [em28xx] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000 IP: [ffffffffa00997be] :ir_common:ir_input_free+0x26/0x3e

2009-12-06 Thread Sander Eikelenboom
Hello Mauro, With the patch the NULL pointer dereference is fixed. Thx, Sander Sunday, December 6, 2009, 1:53:40 AM, you wrote: Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Hi All, Tried to update my v4l-dvb modules today, but got a bug with my pinnacle card, seems to be related to the recent changes

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:12:34PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em Fri, 4 Dec 2009 02:06:42 -0800 Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com escreveu: evdev does not really care what you use as scancode. So nobody stops your driver to report index as a scancode

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:12:34PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: How related lirc-core to the current lirc code? If it is not the same maybe we should not call it lirc to avoid confusion. Just for better illustrate what I'm seeing, I broke the IR generic code into

Re: [em28xx] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000 IP: [ffffffffa00997be] :ir_common:ir_input_free+0x26/0x3e

2009-12-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Hello Mauro, With the patch the NULL pointer dereference is fixed. Thank you for testing. I've applied the patch on my tree. Cheers, Mauro. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi, On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 04:36:33AM +0100, hermann pitton wrote: Hi, Am Freitag, den 04.12.2009, 19:28 -0500 schrieb Jon Smirl: On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Christoph Bartelmus l...@bartelmus.de wrote: BTW, I just came across a XMP remote that seems to

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Christoph Bartelmus
Hi Dmitry, on 05 Dec 09 at 22:55, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: [...] I do not believe you are being realistic. Sometimes we just need to say that the device is a POS and is just not worth it. Remember, there is still lirc hole for the hard core people still using solder to produce something out of

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Christoph Bartelmus
Hi Dmitry, on 04 Dec 09 at 15:15, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: [...] http://lirc.sourceforge.net/remotes/lg/6711A20015N This is an air-conditioner remote. The entries that you see in this config file are not really separate buttons. Instead the remote just sends the current settings for e.g.

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Christoph Bartelmus
Hi Jon, on 04 Dec 09 at 19:28, Jon Smirl wrote: BTW, I just came across a XMP remote that seems to generate 3x64 bit scan codes. Anyone here has docs on the XMP protocol? Assuming a general purpose receiver (not one with fixed hardware decoding), is it important for Linux to receive IR

Re: Mantis – anyone?

2009-12-06 Thread Matthias Wächter
Manu, Thanks for taking care. Please try http://jusst.de/hg/v4l-dvb and report the issues It looks as if dependencies and frontends are not in line. • dependencies for my card’s relevant frontends STB0899, STB6100, and LNBP21 are missing from Kconfig, • dependency for CU1216 is in, but

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Jon Smirl
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Christoph Bartelmus l...@bartelmus.de wrote: Hi Jon, on 04 Dec 09 at 19:28, Jon Smirl wrote: BTW, I just came across a XMP remote that seems to generate 3x64 bit scan codes. Anyone here has docs on the XMP protocol? Assuming a general purpose receiver (not

[PATCH] gspca: make device_table[]s constant

2009-12-06 Thread Németh Márton
From: Márton Németh nm...@freemail.hu The device_table structure is used as a constant. The driver_info field is only copied to the struct sd so it is also not modified. Signed-off-by: Márton Németh nm...@freemail.hu --- diff -r e16961fe157d linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/conex.c ---

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Andy Walls awa...@radix.net writes: Yes, I agree. I do not know what percentage of current Linux users are technical vs non-technical, so I cannot gauge the current improtance. I can see the trend line though: as time goes by, the percentage of all linux users that have a technical bent

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes: I do not believe you are being realistic. Sometimes we just need to say that the device is a POS and is just not worth it. Remember, there is still lirc hole for the hard core people still using solder to produce something out of the spare

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Jon Smirl
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Krzysztof Halasa k...@pm.waw.pl wrote: Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface (kernel-userspace) and merging the actual LIRC code first? In-kernel decoding can wait a bit, it doesn't change any kernel-user interface. I'd like to see a

[PATCH -next resend/fixed] media/miro: fix kconfig depends/select

2009-12-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap randy.dun...@oracle.com miropcm20 uses ALSA (snd_) interfaces from the SND_MIRO driver, so it should depend on SND. (selecting SND_MIRO when CONFIG_SND is not enabled is a problem.) drivers/built-in.o: In function `vidioc_s_ctrl': radio-miropcm20.c:(.text+0x227499): undefined

[cron job] v4l-dvb daily build 2.6.22 and up: ERRORS, 2.6.16-2.6.21: WARNINGS

2009-12-06 Thread Hans Verkuil
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for the kernels and architectures in the list below. Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb: date:Sun Dec 6 19:00:09 CET 2009 path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb changeset: 13576:121066e283e5 gcc version: gcc

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes: All the IR's I found with V4L/DVB use up to 16 bits code (or 24 bits, for NEC extended protocol). However, currently, the drivers were getting only 7 bits, due to the old way to implement EVIO[S|G]KEYCODE. I know, however, one i2c chip

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com writes: The in-kernel support can start small and add protocols and maps over time. Protocols, yes. Maps - we certainly don't want megatons of maps in the kernel. The existing ones have to be removed, some time. -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com writes: Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface (kernel-userspace) and merging the actual LIRC code first? In-kernel decoding can wait a bit, it doesn't change any kernel-user interface. I'd like to see a semi-complete design for an in-kernel IR

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Jon Smirl
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Krzysztof Halasa k...@pm.waw.pl wrote: Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com writes: Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface (kernel-userspace) and merging the actual LIRC code first? In-kernel decoding can wait a bit, it doesn't change any kernel-user

Re: IR Receiver on an Tevii S470

2009-12-06 Thread Andy Walls
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 03:03 +0200, Igor M. Liplianin wrote: On 21 ноября 2009 22:41:42 Andy Walls wrote: Matthias Fechner schrieb: I bought some days ago a Tevii S470 DVB-S2 (PCI-E) card and got it running with the driver from: http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/s2-liplianin

Re: IR Receiver on an Tevii S470

2009-12-06 Thread Matthias Fechner
Hi Andy, Andy Walls wrote: 1. Does the remote for the TeVii S470 use the same codes as linux/drivers/media/common/ir-keymaps.c : ir_codes_tevii_nec[] or some other remote code table we have in the kernel? I don't know how it should work with the kernel but I use the remote together

Re: soc-camera: what's in the queue for 2.6.33

2009-12-06 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Dear Guennadi Sorry for late response Morimoto-san: I modified a bit your mt9t112 driver, apart from just porting it to the current mediabus version. Please check, if you agree with all changes and if it still works:-) Of course I agree. But sorry I'm very busy this week, so, I can not

Re: IR Receiver on an Tevii S470

2009-12-06 Thread Igor M. Liplianin
On 6 декабря 2009 23:40:54 Andy Walls wrote: On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 03:03 +0200, Igor M. Liplianin wrote: On 21 ноября 2009 22:41:42 Andy Walls wrote: Matthias Fechner schrieb: I bought some days ago a Tevii S470 DVB-S2 (PCI-E) card and got it running with the driver from:

Success for Compro E650F analog television and alsa sound.

2009-12-06 Thread Igor M. Liplianin
Hi Steve I'm able to watch now analog television with Compro E650F. I rich this by merging your cx23885-alsa tree and adding some modifications for Compro card definition. Actually, I take it from Mygica definition, only tuner type and DVB port is different. Tested with Tvtime. tvtime | arecord

Re: IR Receiver on an Tevii S470

2009-12-06 Thread Andy Walls
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 03:23 +0200, Igor M. Liplianin wrote: On 6 декабря 2009 23:40:54 Andy Walls wrote: On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 03:03 +0200, Igor M. Liplianin wrote: On 21 ноября 2009 22:41:42 Andy Walls wrote: Matthias Fechner schrieb: I bought some days ago a Tevii S470 DVB-S2

Re: soc-camera: what's in the queue for 2.6.33

2009-12-06 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: Dear Guennadi Sorry for late response Morimoto-san: I modified a bit your mt9t112 driver, apart from just porting it to the current mediabus version. Please check, if you agree with all changes and if it still works:-) Of course I

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:03:31AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:12:34PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em Fri, 4 Dec 2009 02:06:42 -0800 Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com escreveu: evdev does not really care what you

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 12:58:00PM +0100, Christoph Bartelmus wrote: Hi Dmitry, on 04 Dec 09 at 15:15, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: [...] http://lirc.sourceforge.net/remotes/lg/6711A20015N This is an air-conditioner remote. The entries that you see in this config file are not really