On 21/4/09, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Agustin wrote:
Hi,
On 21/4/09, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
Video (sub)devices, connecting to SoCs over generic i2c busses cannot
provide a pointer to struct v4l2_device
Hi Guennadi,
--- Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Agustin wrote:
Which patchset should one use today to have latest and most stable
mx3_camera driver in 2.6.29?
[snip]
Please, use http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernelm=123866462620240w=2
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Agustin wrote:
Hi Guennadi,
--- Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Agustin wrote:
Which patchset should one use today to have latest and most stable
mx3_camera
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Agustin wrote:
No, as there is no driver_match_device() in 2.6.29 nor in my patched
version. How important is that?
No, sorry, forget it, that's not your problem.
Meanwhile I noticed that IRQ 176 is being
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Agustin Ferrin Pozuelo wrote:
...
I thought about the fact that I was only queuing one buffer, and that
this might be a corner case as sample code uses a lot of them. And that
in the older code that funny things
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
This also fixes the case of a single queued buffer, for example, when taking a
single frame snapshot with the mx3_camera driver.
Reported-by: Agustin
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
Signed-off-by: Agustin Ferrin Pozuelo
--- On Sat, 16/5/09, Russell King wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 08:22:18PM
+0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hopefully with real tags (iow, with email
addresses) rather than what's
shown above (which is unacceptable.)
Sure, Dan has done it perfectly:
Guennadi,
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
General code clean-up: remove superfluous semicolons, update comments.
Robustness improvements: add DMA error handling to the ISR, move common code
fragments to functions, fix scatter-gather element queuing in the ISR,
--- On 18/2/09, Russell King -wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:09:55AM -0800, Agustin wrote:
$ patch -p1 --dry-run p1
patching file drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_idmac.c
patch: malformed patch at line 29: /*
Looks like your patches lost their format while on their way,
specially every
channel.
Any clue?
--
Agustin Ferrin Pozuelo
Embedded Systems Consultant
http://embedded.ferrin.org/
--- On 18/2/09, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski l...@denx.de
General code clean-up: remove superfluous semicolons, update comments.
Robustness improvements: add DMA
--- On 28/2/09, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Agustin wrote:
Hi Guennadi,
I am having trouble while probing ipu idmac:
At boot:
ipu-core: probe of ipu-core failed with error -22
Which is apparently happening at ipu_idmac:1706:
1695 static int __init ipu_probe
Holy cow...
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Agustin wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Agustin wrote:
No, as there is no driver_match_device() in 2.6.29 nor in my patched
version. How important is that?
No, sorry, forget it, that's not your problem
12 matches
Mail list logo
