Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure

2009-12-08 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes: Jon Smirl wrote: This model is complicated by the fact that some remotes that look like multi-function remotes aren't really multifunction. The remote bundled with the MS MCE receiver is one. That remote is a single function device even

Re: [RFC v2] Another approach to IR

2009-12-04 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:33:56PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Ferenc Wagner wrote: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes: We should not forget that simple IR's don't have any key to select the address, so the produced

Re: [RFC v2] Another approach to IR

2009-12-03 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com writes: Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Now I understand that if 2 remotes send completely identical signals we won't be able to separete them, but in cases when we can I think we should. They are the same

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-11-27 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Bartelmus l...@bartelmus.de wrote: Maybe we decide to take the existing LIRC system as is and not integrate it into the input subsystem. But I think there is a window here to update the LIRC design to use the