Re: [patch] [media] af9013: change to

2012-01-09 Thread Antti Palosaari
Clear bug, I will test it later when applied to master if not already. 
Thanks!


Acked-by: Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi


On 01/05/2012 08:23 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:

This is just a cleanup, it doesn't change how the code works.  These
are compound conditions and not bitwise operations so it should be
and not.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenterdan.carpen...@oracle.com

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c 
b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c
index e6ba3e0..1413c51 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c
@@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ static int af9013_wr_regs(struct af9013_state *priv, u16 
reg, const u8 *val,
int ret, i;
u8 mbox = (0  7)|(0  6)|(1  1)|(1  0);

-   if ((priv-config.ts_mode == AF9013_TS_USB)
-   ((reg  0xff00) != 0xff00)  ((reg  0xff00) != 0xae00)) {
+   if ((priv-config.ts_mode == AF9013_TS_USB)
+   ((reg  0xff00) != 0xff00)  ((reg  0xff00) != 0xae00)) {
mbox |= ((len - 1)  2);
ret = af9013_wr_regs_i2c(priv, mbox, reg, val, len);
} else {
@@ -142,8 +142,8 @@ static int af9013_rd_regs(struct af9013_state *priv, u16 
reg, u8 *val, int len)
int ret, i;
u8 mbox = (0  7)|(0  6)|(1  1)|(0  0);

-   if ((priv-config.ts_mode == AF9013_TS_USB)
-   ((reg  0xff00) != 0xff00)  ((reg  0xff00) != 0xae00)) {
+   if ((priv-config.ts_mode == AF9013_TS_USB)
+   ((reg  0xff00) != 0xff00)  ((reg  0xff00) != 0xae00)) {
mbox |= ((len - 1)  2);
ret = af9013_rd_regs_i2c(priv, mbox, reg, val, len);
} else {



--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [patch] [media] af9013: change to

2012-01-09 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:40:49PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote:
 Clear bug, I will test it later when applied to master if not
 already. Thanks!

You're welcome, but it's not a bug because (1  1  0) is the same
as (1  1  0) but if one of them wasn't a bool it would be a
problem.  The other difference between  and  is that  has
orderring guarantees but that's also not a factor here.

regards,
dan carpenter



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[patch] [media] af9013: change to

2012-01-04 Thread Dan Carpenter
This is just a cleanup, it doesn't change how the code works.  These
are compound conditions and not bitwise operations so it should be 
and not .

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c 
b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c
index e6ba3e0..1413c51 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c
@@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ static int af9013_wr_regs(struct af9013_state *priv, u16 
reg, const u8 *val,
int ret, i;
u8 mbox = (0  7)|(0  6)|(1  1)|(1  0);
 
-   if ((priv-config.ts_mode == AF9013_TS_USB) 
-   ((reg  0xff00) != 0xff00)  ((reg  0xff00) != 0xae00)) {
+   if ((priv-config.ts_mode == AF9013_TS_USB) 
+   ((reg  0xff00) != 0xff00)  ((reg  0xff00) != 0xae00)) {
mbox |= ((len - 1)  2);
ret = af9013_wr_regs_i2c(priv, mbox, reg, val, len);
} else {
@@ -142,8 +142,8 @@ static int af9013_rd_regs(struct af9013_state *priv, u16 
reg, u8 *val, int len)
int ret, i;
u8 mbox = (0  7)|(0  6)|(1  1)|(0  0);
 
-   if ((priv-config.ts_mode == AF9013_TS_USB) 
-   ((reg  0xff00) != 0xff00)  ((reg  0xff00) != 0xae00)) {
+   if ((priv-config.ts_mode == AF9013_TS_USB) 
+   ((reg  0xff00) != 0xff00)  ((reg  0xff00) != 0xae00)) {
mbox |= ((len - 1)  2);
ret = af9013_rd_regs_i2c(priv, mbox, reg, val, len);
} else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html