Em Sat, 2 May 2009 09:12:11 +0200
Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org escreveu:
Mauro, please pull Mike's pvrusb2-dev work as soon as he asks you to do
so. Then I'll rebase my own patch set and send it again.
Jean and Mike,
Any news about this subject?
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this
Jean:
I have another idea that I think you'll like. I'm putting the finishing
touches on the patch right now.
What I have implements correct ir_video loading for the pvrusb2 driver.
It also includes a lookup table (though with only 1 entry right now) to
determine the proper I2C address and
Hi Mike,
Sorry for the late answer.
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:53:35 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:25:19 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hmm, I thought that our latest discussions had (at least partly)
obsoleted your patches.
Hi Jean,
I had actually written out a longer, detailed, point-by-point reply
earlier today, but before I could finish it I got interrupted with a
crisis. And then another. And that's kind of how my day went. Now I'm
finally back to this, but I have another e-mail debacle to immediately
Hi again Mike,
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:25:19 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:35:55 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote:
I thought we were going to leave the pvrusb2 driver out of this since
I've already got a change ready that also includes additional logic to
take into
Let card drivers probe for IR receiver devices and instantiate them if
found. Ultimately it would be better if we could stop probing
completely, but I suspect this won't be possible for all card types.
There's certainly room for cleanups. For example, some drivers are
sharing I2C adapter IDs, so
I thought we were going to leave the pvrusb2 driver out of this since
I've already got a change ready that also includes additional logic to
take into account the properties of the hardware device (i.e. only
activate ir-kbd-i2c when we know it has a chance of working).
-Mike
On Fri, 17
