>This being said, VIDIOC_S_INPUT was designed to switch analog sources. I'm
>not
>sure it would be the best would to multiplex streams from two digital
>sensors
>for instance. Even for analog signals, using the ioctl from userspace
>usually
>results in at least one corrupt frame if you don't synch
Hi,
On Friday 26 February 2010 14:05:30 Muralidharan Karicheri wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Pawel Osciak wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 08:41:49 Pawel Osciak wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:12:18 +0100
>
> > Laurent Pinchart
Hi Pawel and Mauro,
On Friday 26 February 2010 13:04:54 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Pawel Osciak wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 08:41:49 Pawel Osciak wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:12:18 +0100
> >>>
> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> As for the REQBUF, I've always thought it'
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Pawel Osciak wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 08:41:49 Pawel Osciak wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:12:18 +0100
> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
As for the REQBUF, I've always thought it'd be nice to be able to ask the
>>
Pawel Osciak wrote:
>> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 08:41:49 Pawel Osciak wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:12:18 +0100
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> As for the REQBUF, I've always thought it'd be nice to be able to ask the
>>> driver for the "recommended" number of buffers that should be used
>On Tuesday 23 February 2010 08:41:49 Pawel Osciak wrote:
>> >On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:12:18 +0100
>> >Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> As for the REQBUF, I've always thought it'd be nice to be able to ask the
>> driver for the "recommended" number of buffers that should be used by
>> issuing a REQBUF wit
Hi Pavel,
On Tuesday 23 February 2010 08:41:49 Pawel Osciak wrote:
> >On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:12:18 +0100
> >Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> On Saturday 20 February 2010 15:00:21 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> > 1) The spec mentions that the memory field should be set for
> >> > VIDIOC_DQBUF. But videobuf
Hi Jean-François,
On Monday 22 February 2010 10:47:41 Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> Hi Hans and Laurent,
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:12:18 +0100
>
> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 February 2010 15:00:21 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > 1) The spec mentions that the memory field should be set
Hello,
>On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:12:18 +0100
>Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> On Saturday 20 February 2010 15:00:21 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> > 1) The spec mentions that the memory field should be set for
>> > VIDIOC_DQBUF. But videobuf doesn't need it and it makes no sense to
>> > me either unless it is f
Hi Hans and Laurent,
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:12:18 +0100
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Saturday 20 February 2010 15:00:21 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > 1) The spec mentions that the memory field should be set for
> > VIDIOC_DQBUF. But videobuf doesn't need it and it makes no sense to
> > me either unless
Hi Hans,
On Saturday 20 February 2010 15:00:21 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> I have a few more questions regarding the streaming I/O API:
>
> 1) The spec mentions that the memory field should be set for VIDIOC_DQBUF.
> But videobuf doesn't need it and it makes no sense to me either unless it
> is for sym
I have a few more questions regarding the streaming I/O API:
1) The spec mentions that the memory field should be set for VIDIOC_DQBUF.
But videobuf doesn't need it and it makes no sense to me either unless it
is for symmetry with VIDIOC_QBUF. Strictly speaking QBUF doesn't need it
either, but it
12 matches
Mail list logo
