Re: [PATCH, RFC] Document the videobuf layer

2009-12-14 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:36:08 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > It is probably better to have it as a separate document like what you've > proposed, > so, could you please drop the duplicated information that is there and move > any > missing info that might not be on your new doc? Yes, I ca

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Document the videobuf layer

2009-12-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Jon, You probably lost my feedback. I've added some time ago a videobuf description at Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt. It is probably better to have it as a separate document like what you've proposed, so, could you please drop the duplicated information that is there and move

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Document the videobuf layer

2009-12-03 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Jonathan Corbet wrote: > I've taken the liberty of dropping this into my docs-next tree, and > will send it upward unless there are objections. Hopefully it's > useful... Hi Jon, Thanks for the doc! I'll take a more detailed review, but I've added already some bits about videobuf at: Documenta