Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2010-01-10 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: Hi Mauro On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: So, is the doc patch, that I've sent to the list ok? Ok, the hunk for the automatically (in hg) generated file will get dropped, and otherwise does it look correct? It

Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2009-12-24 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Mauro On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: So, is the doc patch, that I've sent to the list ok? Ok, the hunk for the automatically (in hg) generated file will get dropped, and otherwise does it look correct? It looks correctly on my

Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2009-12-17 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hans Verkuil wrote: On Monday 14 December 2009 21:41:20 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Jonathan Cameron wrote: Having bridge-specific code in a sub-device driver will be a disaster in the long run. Well, we've seen what happens when you do it that way. True. As far as

Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2009-12-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: Hi Mauro, At last soc-camera and mediabus lot for 2.6.33. Note, that one of this patches adds new fourcc codes. A patch for their documentation will be submitted immediately. Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~gliakhovetski/v4l-dvb for the following

Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2009-12-14 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: Hi Mauro, At last soc-camera and mediabus lot for 2.6.33. Note, that one of this patches adds new fourcc codes. A patch for their documentation will be submitted immediately. Please pull from

Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2009-12-14 Thread Jonathan Cameron
Hi All, 3) it would be interesting to patch the other sensor drivers to be compatible with soc_camera (mt9v011/ov7670); Well, this could be done, yes, but does it make sense to do this blindly without any hardware to test? I would rather add such conversions on a one-by-one basis as

Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2009-12-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: Hi Mauro, At last soc-camera and mediabus lot for 2.6.33. Note, that one of this patches adds new fourcc codes. A patch for their documentation will be submitted immediately.

Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2009-12-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Jonathan Cameron wrote: Hi All, 3) it would be interesting to patch the other sensor drivers to be compatible with soc_camera (mt9v011/ov7670); Well, this could be done, yes, but does it make sense to do this blindly without any hardware to test? I would rather add such conversions on

Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2009-12-14 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Jonathan Cameron wrote: Hi All, 3) it would be interesting to patch the other sensor drivers to be compatible with soc_camera (mt9v011/ov7670); Well, this could be done, yes, but does it make sense to do this blindly without any hardware to test? I would

Re: [PULL] soc-camera and mediabus

2009-12-14 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday 14 December 2009 21:41:20 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Jonathan Cameron wrote: Hi All, 3) it would be interesting to patch the other sensor drivers to be compatible with soc_camera (mt9v011/ov7670); Well, this could be done, yes, but does