Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi Mauro
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
So, is the doc patch, that I've sent to the list ok? Ok, the hunk for the
automatically (in hg) generated file will get dropped, and otherwise does
it look correct?
It
Hi Mauro
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
So, is the doc patch, that I've sent to the list ok? Ok, the hunk for the
automatically (in hg) generated file will get dropped, and otherwise does
it look correct?
It looks correctly on my
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday 14 December 2009 21:41:20 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Having bridge-specific code in a sub-device driver will be a disaster in the
long run. Well, we've seen what happens when you do it that way.
True.
As far as
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi Mauro,
At last soc-camera and mediabus lot for 2.6.33. Note, that one of this
patches adds new fourcc codes. A patch for their documentation will be
submitted immediately.
Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~gliakhovetski/v4l-dvb
for the following
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi Mauro,
At last soc-camera and mediabus lot for 2.6.33. Note, that one of this
patches adds new fourcc codes. A patch for their documentation will be
submitted immediately.
Please pull from
Hi All,
3) it would be interesting to patch the other sensor drivers to be compatible
with soc_camera (mt9v011/ov7670);
Well, this could be done, yes, but does it make sense to do this blindly
without any hardware to test? I would rather add such conversions on a
one-by-one basis as
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi Mauro,
At last soc-camera and mediabus lot for 2.6.33. Note, that one of this
patches adds new fourcc codes. A patch for their documentation will be
submitted immediately.
Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Hi All,
3) it would be interesting to patch the other sensor drivers to be
compatible
with soc_camera (mt9v011/ov7670);
Well, this could be done, yes, but does it make sense to do this blindly
without any hardware to test? I would rather add such conversions on
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Hi All,
3) it would be interesting to patch the other sensor drivers to be
compatible
with soc_camera (mt9v011/ov7670);
Well, this could be done, yes, but does it make sense to do this blindly
without any hardware to test? I would
On Monday 14 December 2009 21:41:20 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Hi All,
3) it would be interesting to patch the other sensor drivers to be
compatible
with soc_camera (mt9v011/ov7670);
Well, this could be done, yes, but does
10 matches
Mail list logo