On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:43:13PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
>> Ville Syrjälä writes:
>>
>> > What is this format anyway? -ENODOCS
>>
>> Same as MESA_FORMAT_SARGB8 and __DRI_IMAGE_FORMAT_SARGB8 :-)
>>
>> > If its just an srgb version of AR
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:57:23AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:12:13PM -0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > I don't know what else you'd propose? Pass an X visual in the ioctl?
> > An EGL config? This is our name space, we can add stuff as we need
> > (as Keith is doin
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:12:13PM -0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> I don't know what else you'd propose? Pass an X visual in the ioctl?
> An EGL config? This is our name space, we can add stuff as we need
> (as Keith is doing here). include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h is the
> canonical source for th
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:43:13PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Ville Syrjälä writes:
>
> > What is this format anyway? -ENODOCS
>
> Same as MESA_FORMAT_SARGB8 and __DRI_IMAGE_FORMAT_SARGB8 :-)
>
> > If its just an srgb version of ARGB, then I wouldn't really want it
> > in drm_fourcc.h. I
Kristian Høgsberg writes:
> I already explained to Keith why we use different sets of format codes
> in the DRI interface, but it's always fun to slam other peoples code.
As we discussed, my complaint isn't so much about __DRI_IMAGE_FOURCC,
but the fact that the __DRIimage interfaces use *both*
Ville Syrjälä writes:
> What is this format anyway? -ENODOCS
Same as MESA_FORMAT_SARGB8 and __DRI_IMAGE_FORMAT_SARGB8 :-)
> If its just an srgb version of ARGB, then I wouldn't really want it
> in drm_fourcc.h. I expect colorspacy stuff will be handled by various
> crtc/plane properties in
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:12:13PM -0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:17:37PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > Daniel Vetter writes:
> > >
> > >> Hm, where do we have the canonical source for all these fourcc co
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:17:37PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> > Daniel Vetter writes:
> >
> >> Hm, where do we have the canonical source for all these fourcc codes? I'm
> >> asking since we have our own copy in the kernel as drm_fourcc.h
