Hi Guennadi,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> On 02/18/2015 07:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > Unlike scan_async_group(), soc_of_bind() doesn't allocate its
>> > soc_camera_async_client structure using devm_kzall
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 02/18/2015 07:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > Unlike scan_async_group(), soc_of_bind() doesn't allocate its
> > soc_camera_async_client structure using devm_kzalloc(), but has it
> > embedded inside the soc_of_info structure. He
Hello.
On 02/18/2015 07:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Unlike scan_async_group(), soc_of_bind() doesn't allocate its
soc_camera_async_client structure using devm_kzalloc(), but has it
embedded inside the soc_of_info structure. Hence on failure, it must
not free it using devm_kfree(), as this
Unlike scan_async_group(), soc_of_bind() doesn't allocate its
soc_camera_async_client structure using devm_kzalloc(), but has it
embedded inside the soc_of_info structure. Hence on failure, it must
not free it using devm_kfree(), as this will cause a warning, and may
cause slab corruption:
so
