Am Donnerstag, den 14.05.2009, 03:10 +0200 schrieb hermann pitton:
Hi Dmitry :)
[snip]
That depends on how up to date the app is, once selected, even per
channel, you don't have to do this ever again and don't need any insmod
options at all currently.
I recently tried to keep it for
Hi
1. AGC TOP of RF part - I think need support for MK3
2. Changing to 441MHz is not critical. We can write some
information about this case to Wiki or docs.
for 2.: Discussed to the end if you stay at 441MHz. If you still
want to have it in, just send a patch and no more info is
Hi Dmitry,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.05.2009, 07:37 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi hermann
Am Sonntag, den 10.05.2009, 08:52 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi All.
[snip]
Channel designations I dug out of ivtv-tune:
S38 439.250 MHz (European cable)
H18
1. AGC TOP of RF part - I think need support for MK3
2. Changing to 441MHz is not critical. We can write some information about this
case to Wiki or docs.
for 2.: Discussed to the end if you stay at 441MHz. If you still want to
have it in, just send a patch and no more info is needed.
On Mon, 11 May 2009 05:35:51 +0200
hermann pitton hermann-pit...@arcor.de wrote:
Dmitri,
Am Sonntag, den 10.05.2009, 08:52 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi All.
[snip]
Channel designations I dug out of ivtv-tune:
S38 439.250 MHz (European cable)
H18 439.250
Hi All.
[snip]
Channel designations I dug out of ivtv-tune:
S38 439.250 MHz (European cable)
H18 439.250 MHz (SECAM France)
47 440.250 MHz (PAL China)
059 440.250 MHz (PAL Argentina)
come close, but are unaffected by the change from 442 to 441 as
the bandswitch
Dmitri,
Am Sonntag, den 10.05.2009, 08:52 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi All.
[snip]
Channel designations I dug out of ivtv-tune:
S38 439.250 MHz (European cable)
H18 439.250 MHz (SECAM France)
47 440.250 MHz (PAL China)
059 440.250 MHz (PAL Argentina)
[snip]
Channel designations I dug out of ivtv-tune:
S38 439.250 MHz (European cable)
H18 439.250 MHz (SECAM France)
47 440.250 MHz (PAL China)
059 440.250 MHz (PAL Argentina)
come close, but are unaffected by the change from 442 to 441 as the
bandswitch cutover point.
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 02:08 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 23:03 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
For the change of UHF start I don't see any problem.
If you're talking about the frequency for the bandswitch, I don't see a
problem either in general. It may cause a
Am Freitag, den 08.05.2009, 22:01 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 02:08 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 23:03 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
For the change of UHF start I don't see any problem.
If you're talking about the frequency for the
Hi Andy
Sorry me delay. I discuss about it with our programmer.
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 20:12 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 19:59 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:18:32 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 23:03 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 02:01 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 04:42 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi Hermann
Hi Dmitry,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2009, 20:12 +1000 schrieb Dmitri
Hi Hermann
Hi Dmitry,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2009, 20:12 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 19:59 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:18:32 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 04:42 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi Hermann
Hi Dmitry,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2009, 20:12 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 19:59 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:18:32 -0300
Mauro
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 02:01 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 04:42 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi Hermann
Hi Dmitry,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2009, 20:12 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 19:59 +1000
Am Samstag, den 02.05.2009, 04:05 +0200 schrieb hermann pitton:
Am Freitag, den 01.05.2009, 20:52 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 01:55 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
Guys,
[snip]
Do the circuit board traces in the FM1216ME_MK3 support the TDA9887
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 01:55 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
Guys,
[snip]
Do the circuit board traces in the FM1216ME_MK3 support the TDA9887
controlling the gain of the first stage? (I've never opened an
equivalent NTSC tuner assembly to take a look.)
equivalent NTSC tuners
Am Freitag, den 01.05.2009, 20:52 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 01:55 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
Guys,
[snip]
Do the circuit board traces in the FM1216ME_MK3 support the TDA9887
controlling the gain of the first stage? (I've never opened an
Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2009, 21:14 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 20:12 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 19:59 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:18:32 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 19:59 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:18:32 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:29:05 +1000
Dmitri Belimov d.beli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
Step by step.
Hi Dmitry,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2009, 20:12 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 19:59 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:18:32 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:29:05 +1000
Dmitri
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:29:05 +1000
Dmitri Belimov d.beli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
Step by step.
This is patch for change only range of FM1216ME_MK3. Slow tunning is not a
big problem.
Dmitri,
I'll mark those patches as RFC at patchwork until the end of those discussions.
After that,
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:18:32 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:29:05 +1000
Dmitri Belimov d.beli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
Step by step.
This is patch for change only range of FM1216ME_MK3. Slow tunning
is not a big problem.
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 19:59 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:18:32 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:29:05 +1000
Dmitri Belimov d.beli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
Step by step.
This is patch
Hi All
Step by step.
This is patch for change only range of FM1216ME_MK3. Slow tunning is not a big
problem.
diff -r b40d628f830d linux/drivers/media/common/tuners/tuner-types.c
--- a/linux/drivers/media/common/tuners/tuner-types.c Fri Apr 24 01:46:41
2009 -0300
+++
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.04.2009, 19:29 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi All
Step by step.
This is patch for change only range of FM1216ME_MK3. Slow tunning is not a
big problem.
diff -r b40d628f830d linux/drivers/media/common/tuners/tuner-types.c
---
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 02:11 +0200 schrieb hermann pitton:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.04.2009, 19:29 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi All
Step by step.
This is patch for change only range of FM1216ME_MK3. Slow tunning is not a
big problem.
diff -r b40d628f830d
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.04.2009, 20:42 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.04.2009, 19:29 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi All
Step by step.
This is patch for change only range of FM1216ME_MK3. Slow tunning
is not a big problem.
diff -r b40d628f830d
Hi Andy
Hi Dmitri,
Thank you for you responses.
Just a few more comments...
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:36 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi Andy
Dmitri,
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:48 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi All
1. Change middle band. In the end of the
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 26.04.2009, 23:58 +1000 schrieb Dmitri Belimov:
Hi Andy
Hi Dmitri,
Thank you for you responses.
Just a few more comments...
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:36 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi Andy
Dmitri,
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:48 +1000,
Hi Andy
Dmitri,
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:48 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi All
1. Change middle band. In the end of the middle band the
sensitivity of receiver not good. If we switch to higher band,
sensitivity more better. Hardware trick.
This concerns me slightly as it does
Hi Dmitri,
Thank you for you responses.
Just a few more comments...
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:36 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi Andy
Dmitri,
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:48 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi All
1. Change middle band. In the end of the middle band the
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2009, 21:43 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
Hi Dmitri,
Thank you for you responses.
Just a few more comments...
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:36 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi Andy
Dmitri,
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:48 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi Andy and Dmitry,
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 22:08 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
Dmitri,
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:48 +1000, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
Hi All
1. Change middle band. In the end of the middle band the sensitivity of
receiver not good.
If we switch to higher band,
34 matches
Mail list logo