Re: [PATCH] Updated videobuf documentation

2010-02-22 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:09:19 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote: Not anymore: there's a patch that added USERPTR support for videobuf-dma-contig: commit 720b17e759a50635c429ccaa2ec3d01edb4f92d6 Author: Magnus Damm d...@igel.co.jp Date: Tue Jun 16 15:32:36 2009 -0700

Re: [PATCH] Updated videobuf documentation

2010-02-22 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/22/10 12:47, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:09:19 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote: Not anymore: there's a patch that added USERPTR support for videobuf-dma-contig: commit 720b17e759a50635c429ccaa2ec3d01edb4f92d6 Author: Magnus Damm

Re: [PATCH] Updated videobuf documentation

2010-02-22 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Randy Dunlap wrote: On 02/22/10 12:47, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:09:19 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote: Not anymore: there's a patch that added USERPTR support for videobuf-dma-contig: commit 720b17e759a50635c429ccaa2ec3d01edb4f92d6 Author:

[PATCH] Updated videobuf documentation

2010-02-18 Thread Jonathan Corbet
Here (finally) is a new version of the videobuf documentation patch. As requested by Mauro, I have cleaned up the (now) redundant information in v4l2-framework.txt. A couple of errors from the first version have also been remedied. jon V4L2: Add a document describing the videobuf layer