[PATCH] dvb-api: update documentation, chapter1 (Resubmit)

2009-03-15 Thread wk
Mauro Carvalho Chehab schrieb: Hi wk, Let's commit what we currently have. Could you please re-submit the patch again, this time providing a proper description, and your SOB? Cheers, Mauro. The attached patch provides the following changes to DVB API: - files changed - dvbapi.tex

Re: [PATCH] dvb-api: update documentation, chapter1

2009-03-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi wk, Let's commit what we currently have. Could you please re-submit the patch again, this time providing a proper description, and your SOB? Cheers, Mauro. On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:19:41 +0100 wk wrote: > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> + > >> +For this API documentation applies an even/odd

Re: [PATCH] dvb-api: update documentation, chapter1

2009-02-26 Thread wk
Why do I have a feeling even the updated doc will be full of spelling & grammatical errors? ;) Probably, because none of the writers so far where native English. Therefore i'am really happy that *you* now took over all the responsibility to find all that spelling and grammatical errors.

Re: [PATCH] dvb-api: update documentation, chapter1

2009-02-26 Thread VDR User
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:35 AM, VDR User wrote: >> It seems better to say, instead, that "Version 4 was suggested, but it >> weren't completed nor implemented". > > That's improper.  I think you mean, "Version 4 was suggested but > neither completed, nor implemented". > > Why do I have a feeling

Re: [PATCH] dvb-api: update documentation, chapter1

2009-02-26 Thread wk
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: + +For this API documentation applies an even/odd versioning scheme, stating +unstable or stable versions of that API. Only stable API versions should +be used for developing drivers and applications. Hmm... I wouldn't add the above. I don't think we should use

Re: [PATCH] dvb-api: update documentation, chapter1

2009-02-26 Thread VDR User
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > It seems better to say, instead, that "Version 4 was suggested, but it > weren't completed nor implemented". That's improper. I think you mean, "Version 4 was suggested but neither completed, nor implemented". Why do I have a feel

Re: [PATCH] dvb-api: update documentation, chapter1

2009-02-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:39:33 +0100 wk wrote: > Since dvb-api doc is still outdated by six years... > > > The following patch changes dvbapi.pdf as following: > ___ > > - change from twosided book format to singlesided

[PATCH] dvb-api: update documentation, chapter1

2009-02-22 Thread wk
Since dvb-api doc is still outdated by six years... The following patch changes dvbapi.pdf as following: ___ - change from twosided book format to singlesided book format. * By doing so, the readability is improved and