Re: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support

2009-11-26 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Magnus > So now I've done some testing of the mt9t112 sensor hooked up to CEU0 > on the ecovec board. I tried 16-bit RGB and NV12 in various > resolutions with mplayer. My only comment is that it seems to take a > bit of time to setup the sensor initially, but that may be something > related t

Re: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support

2009-11-25 Thread Magnus Damm
Hey Morimoto-san, On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: >> Do you have any mt9t112 platform data for the ecovec board? I'd like >> to try out this patch but I don't know which board specific parts that >> are missing! > > Yes I have. > I attached it. > This platform patch is b

Re: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support

2009-11-25 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Magnus > Do you have any mt9t112 platform data for the ecovec board? I'd like > to try out this patch but I don't know which board specific parts that > are missing! Yes I have. I attached it. This platform patch is based on Guennadi's latest patches. I also attached tw9910 platform patch. P

Re: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support

2009-11-25 Thread Magnus Damm
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto > --- >>> Guennadi > > I add new number in v4l2-chip-ident.h > Is it OK for you ? > > This camera is very picky. > So, it have a lot of constant value. > > The register of mt9t112 and mt9t111 are same. >

RE: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support

2009-11-19 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > Guennadi, > > I am not sure what you mean by ATM sensor. ATM = "At the moment." > Is it not a > Aptina/Micron sensor giving Raw Bayer RGB or Yuv data? I presume it is. > Not sure what prevents it from interfacing with VPFE. > In otherwords

RE: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support

2009-11-19 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
nt: Thursday, November 19, 2009 9:55 AM >To: Karicheri, Muralidharan >Cc: Kuninori Morimoto; Linux-V4L2 >Subject: RE: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support > >On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please make this a generic drive

RE: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support

2009-11-19 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > Hi, > > Please make this a generic driver so that it can be used across > other SoCs as well. BTW, on which SoC have you tested this driver? > There seems to be a lot of soc-camera specific stuffs here. > Example, probe() is getting a pointer

RE: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support

2009-11-19 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Cc: Linux-V4L2 >Subject: [PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support > >Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto >--- >>> Guennadi > >I add new number in v4l2-chip-ident.h >Is it OK for you ? > >This camera is very picky. >So, it have a lot of constant value. > >Th

[PATCH] soc-camera: Add mt9t112 camera support

2009-11-19 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- >> Guennadi I add new number in v4l2-chip-ident.h Is it OK for you ? This camera is very picky. So, it have a lot of constant value. The register of mt9t112 and mt9t111 are same. But I have mt9t112 only. mt9t111 should also work, but I can not check. This p