Re: [PATCH 0/3] gspca: kinect cleanup, ov534 port to control framework

2012-05-18 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
On Wed, 16 May 2012 23:42:43 +0200 Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it wrote: The second patch removes the dependency between auto gain and auto white balance, I'd like to hear Jean-Francois on this, the webcam (the ov772x sensor) is able to set the two parameters independently and the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] gspca: kinect cleanup, ov534 port to control framework

2012-05-18 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Fri, 18 May 2012 09:08:29 +0200 Jean-Francois Moine moin...@free.fr wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2012 23:42:43 +0200 Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it wrote: The second patch removes the dependency between auto gain and auto white balance, I'd like to hear Jean-Francois on this, the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] gspca: kinect cleanup, ov534 port to control framework

2012-05-18 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, Thanks for the patches. I've added them all to my tree, so they will be included in my next pull-req. In the mean time you can find them (unmodified) here: http://git.linuxtv.org/hgoede/gspca.git/shortlog/refs/heads/media-for_v3.5-wip On 05/16/2012 11:42 PM, Antonio Ospite wrote: Hi,

[PATCH 0/3] gspca: kinect cleanup, ov534 port to control framework

2012-05-16 Thread Antonio Ospite
Hi, the first patch just removes traces of the gspca control handling mechanism from the kinect driver; this driver does not have any controls. The change is trivial and can be applied right away, or postponed to when the gspca_main code is removed, you decide. The second patch removes the