On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
So linux-next fa169db2b277ebafa466d625ed2d16b2d2a4bc82 with
20090415/series applies without any rejects and compiles just fine for
Migo-R. However, during runtime I experience the same problem as with
2.6.30-rc plus 0033-0035 + 0036 or v2:
/ #
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
Can you please test on your Migo-R board? I'd be happy to assist you
in setting up your environment.
I did test it and it worked - exactly as you say - with the entire
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
Can you please test on your Migo-R board? I'd be happy to assist you
in setting up your environment.
I did test it and it
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:50:44PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
break if we move it down right after i2c? Another hackish interim solution
would be to replace module_init with subsys_init in i2c-sh_mobile.c like
some other i2c adapters do (including MXC, PXA). That's certainly easier,
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:50:44PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
break if we move it down right after i2c? Another hackish interim solution
would be to replace module_init with subsys_init in i2c-sh_mobile.c like
some other i2c adapters do
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:18:41PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
If there are other requirements to have i2c initialise early we can well
move it up the chain. I think it would be preferable to modifying each i2c
host adapter driver to use subsys_init().
IIRC there are other ordering
Hi Magnus
http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090415/ based on linux-next
history branch, commit ID in -base file. Don't be surprised, that
patch-set also contains a few not directly related patches.
Testing on Migo-R board with 2.6.30-rc2-git-something and the
following
Hello,
I've got one more thing to ask.
Is SoC camera framework supporting for selecting video standards
between camera interface and external camera module? I mean ITU-R BT
601 and 656 things.
Or any different way that I'm not aware is supported?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi
Hi Guennadi,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please,
review and test. My current patch-stack in the form of a
(manually-created) quilt-series is at
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote:
I've got one more thing to ask.
Is SoC camera framework supporting for selecting video standards
between camera interface and external camera module? I mean ITU-R BT
601 and 656 things.
Or any different way that I'm not aware is supported?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please,
review
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
This patch series is a preparation for
Robert Jarzmik robert.jarz...@free.fr writes:
I need to make some additionnal tests with I2C loading/unloading, but
otherwise
it works perfectly for (soc_camera / pxa_camera /mt9m111 combination).
Guennadi,
I made some testing, and there is something I don't understand in the new device
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Robert Jarzmik robert.jarz...@free.fr writes:
I need to make some additionnal tests with I2C loading/unloading, but
otherwise
it works perfectly for (soc_camera / pxa_camera /mt9m111 combination).
Guennadi,
I made some testing, and there
Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes:
- I unload and reload mt9m111 and pxa_camera
= not any better
Actually, I think, in this case it should be found again, as long as you
reload pxa-camera while i2c-pxa is already loaded.
Damn, you're right. I cross-checked, and
This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please,
review and test. My current patch-stack in the form of a
(manually-created) quilt-series is at
http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090415/ based on linux-next
history branch, commit ID in -base file. Don't be
Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes:
This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please,
review and test. My current patch-stack in the form of a
(manually-created) quilt-series is at
http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090415/ based on linux-next
19 matches
Mail list logo
