On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 06:40:42PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:35 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:00:38PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
I like the idea of having an inlined function (like
usb_fill_control_urb), to be sure that
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:00:55AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 11-11-2010 21:40, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:35 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:00:38PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
A good exercise would be to port
Em 12-11-2010 10:12, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:00:55AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 11-11-2010 21:40, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:35 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:00:38PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:56:34AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 12-11-2010 10:12, David Härdeman escreveu:
Shouldn't platform_data be const? And you'll break the refcounting
done in rc_allocate_device() and rc_free_device() /
rc_unregister_device(). Not to mention the silent bugs
Em 12-11-2010 12:08, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:56:34AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 12-11-2010 10:12, David Härdeman escreveu:
Shouldn't platform_data be const? And you'll break the refcounting
done in rc_allocate_device() and rc_free_device() /
Em 10-11-2010 20:01, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:24:16PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 10-11-2010 11:06, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:49:10 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
So, I'll try to merge the pending patches
Em 10-11-2010 20:01, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:24:16PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 10-11-2010 11:06, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:49:10 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
So, I'll try to merge the pending patches
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:54:30 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
The bad news is that ir-kbd-i2c also needs the stuff that are inside
ir.props (e. g., the IR configuration logic). I wrote and just sent 2
patches to the ML with the fix patches, against my media-tree.git,
Em 11-11-2010 13:19, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:54:30 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
The bad news is that ir-kbd-i2c also needs the stuff that are inside
ir.props (e. g., the IR configuration logic). I wrote and just sent 2
patches to the ML
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:00:38PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 11-11-2010 13:19, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:54:30 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
The bad news is that ir-kbd-i2c also needs the stuff that are inside
ir.props (e. g., the
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:35 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:00:38PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
...
struct input_dev only gets input_name, input_phys and input_id from struct
rc_dev, and I did it that way because I didn't want to remove all that
Em 11-11-2010 21:40, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:35 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:00:38PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
...
struct input_dev only gets input_name, input_phys and input_id from struct
rc_dev, and I did it that
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:50:17 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Hi David,
Em 02-11-2010 18:26, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:17 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu
wrote:
This is my current patch queue, the main change is to make struct
rc_dev
the
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 22:25:56 -0500, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
...
Sorry for giving you a late feedback about those patches. I was busy
the
last two
weeks, due to my trip to US for KS/LPC.
I've
Em 10-11-2010 07:24, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:50:17 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Hi David,
Em 02-11-2010 18:26, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:17 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu
wrote:
This is my current patch queue,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:49:10 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Em 10-11-2010 07:24, David Härdeman escreveu:
Not sure if you used the most recent version of patch 4/6 or not.
If you used the most recent, it's based on 2.6.37-rc1 upstream which
has
both the
Em 10-11-2010 11:06, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:49:10 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
So, I'll try to merge the pending patches from your tree. I'll let you
know if I have any problems.
Sounds good. Thanks.
David/Jarod,
I pushed the merged
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:24:16PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 10-11-2010 11:06, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:49:10 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
So, I'll try to merge the pending patches from your tree. I'll let you
know if I
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:17:38 +0100, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu
wrote:
This is my current patch queue, the main change is to make struct rc_dev
the primary interface for rc drivers and to abstract away the fact that
there's an input device lurking in there somewhere.
Mauro,
you have
Hi David,
Em 09-11-2010 08:27, David Härdeman escreveu:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:17:38 +0100, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu
wrote:
This is my current patch queue, the main change is to make struct rc_dev
the primary interface for rc drivers and to abstract away the fact that
there's an
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
...
Sorry for giving you a late feedback about those patches. I was busy the last
two
weeks, due to my trip to US for KS/LPC.
I've applied patches 1 to 3 (in fact, I got the patches from the previous
version
Em 10-11-2010 01:25, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
...
Sorry for giving you a late feedback about those patches. I was busy the
last two
weeks, due to my trip to US for KS/LPC.
I've applied patches 1 to 3 (in
This is my current patch queue, the main change is to make struct rc_dev
the primary interface for rc drivers and to abstract away the fact that
there's an input device lurking in there somewhere.
In addition, the cx88 and winbond-cir drivers are converted to use rc-core.
The patchset is now
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:17 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu wrote:
This is my current patch queue, the main change is to make struct rc_dev
the primary interface for rc drivers and to abstract away the fact that
there's an input device lurking in there somewhere.
In addition, the cx88
24 matches
Mail list logo
