I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-alsa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-alsa.c
b/drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-alsa.c
index e158a1d..eaf0254 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-alsa.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-alsa.c
@@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static int index[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IDX;
/* Index 0-MAX */
static const char *id[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_STR; /* ID for this
card */
static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP;
-module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable cx88x soundcard. default enabled.");
-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for cx88x capture interface(s).");
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE("{{Conexant,23881},"
"{{Conexant,23882},"
"{{Conexant,23883}");
static unsigned int debug;
-module_param(debug,int,0644);
+module_param(debug,int,S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug,"enable debug messages");
/****************************************************************************
--
2.9.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
