Re: [PATCH 2/2] ov9640: fix OmniVision OV9640 sensor driver's I2C remove function

2010-12-07 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi David On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, David Cohen wrote: OmniVision OV9640 driver wasn't deallocating properly its private data as it was requesting the V4L2 subdev struct address instead of the priv struct's one. This patch fixes such problem. This is a bug-fix, that should go into 2.6.37, but it

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ov9640: fix OmniVision OV9640 sensor driver's I2C remove function

2010-12-07 Thread David Cohen
Hi, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote: Hi David On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, David Cohen wrote: OmniVision OV9640 driver wasn't deallocating properly its private data as it was requesting the V4L2 subdev struct address instead of the priv struct's

[PATCH 2/2] ov9640: fix OmniVision OV9640 sensor driver's I2C remove function

2010-12-03 Thread David Cohen
OmniVision OV9640 driver wasn't deallocating properly its private data as it was requesting the V4L2 subdev struct address instead of the priv struct's one. This patch fixes such problem. Signed-off-by: David Cohen daco...@gmail.com --- drivers/media/video/ov9640.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2