Re: [PATCH 2.6.34] schedule inside spin_lock_irqsave

2010-07-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 07-06-2010 10:00, Richard Zidlicky escreveu: On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:51:56PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: On 06/06/2010 02:43 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote: Hi, I have done a minimaly invasive patch for the stable 2.6.34 kernel and stress-tested it for many hours, definitely seems to

Re: [PATCH 2.6.34] schedule inside spin_lock_irqsave

2010-06-07 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:51:56PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: On 06/06/2010 02:43 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote: Hi, I have done a minimaly invasive patch for the stable 2.6.34 kernel and stress-tested it for many hours, definitely seems to improve the behaviour. I have left out your

[PATCH 2.6.34] schedule inside spin_lock_irqsave

2010-06-06 Thread Richard Zidlicky
Hi, I have done a minimaly invasive patch for the stable 2.6.34 kernel and stress-tested it for many hours, definitely seems to improve the behaviour. I have left out your beautification suggestion for now, want to do more playing with other aspects of the driver. There still seem to be

Re: [PATCH 2.6.34] schedule inside spin_lock_irqsave

2010-06-06 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 06/06/2010 02:43 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote: Hi, I have done a minimaly invasive patch for the stable 2.6.34 kernel and stress-tested it for many hours, definitely seems to improve the behaviour. I have left out your beautification suggestion for now, want to do more playing with