Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-06 Thread Thierry Reding
* Thierry Reding wrote: * Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: That means that all we need is to get rid of TM6000_QUIRK_NO_USB_DELAY. I've just reviewed my patches again and it seems that no-USB-delay quirk patch was only partially applied. The actual location where it was introduced was in

Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 06-12-2011 04:51, Thierry Reding wrote: * Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: That means that all we need is to get rid of TM6000_QUIRK_NO_USB_DELAY. I've just reviewed my patches again and it seems that no-USB-delay quirk patch was only partially applied. The actual location where it was

Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 06-12-2011 06:12, Thierry Reding wrote: * Thierry Reding wrote: * Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: That means that all we need is to get rid of TM6000_QUIRK_NO_USB_DELAY. I've just reviewed my patches again and it seems that no-USB-delay quirk patch was only partially applied. The actual

Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-05 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 05-12-2011 05:21, Thierry Reding wrote: * linu...@stefanringel.de wrote: From: Stefan Ringellinu...@stefanringel.de Signed-off-by: Stefan Ringellinu...@stefanringel.de Your commit message needs more details. Why do you think this is a bugfix? Also this commit seems to effectively revert

Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-05 Thread Thierry Reding
* Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On 05-12-2011 05:21, Thierry Reding wrote: * linu...@stefanringel.de wrote: From: Stefan Ringellinu...@stefanringel.de Signed-off-by: Stefan Ringellinu...@stefanringel.de Your commit message needs more details. Why do you think this is a bugfix? Also this

Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-05 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 05-12-2011 13:38, Thierry Reding wrote: * Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On 05-12-2011 05:21, Thierry Reding wrote: * linu...@stefanringel.de wrote: From: Stefan Ringellinu...@stefanringel.de Signed-off-by: Stefan Ringellinu...@stefanringel.de Your commit message needs more details. Why

Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-05 Thread Stefan Ringel
Am 05.12.2011 19:21, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: On 05-12-2011 13:38, Thierry Reding wrote: * Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On 05-12-2011 05:21, Thierry Reding wrote: * linu...@stefanringel.de wrote: From: Stefan Ringellinu...@stefanringel.de Signed-off-by: Stefan

Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-05 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 05-12-2011 18:02, Stefan Ringel wrote: Am 05.12.2011 19:21, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: On 05-12-2011 13:38, Thierry Reding wrote: * Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On 05-12-2011 05:21, Thierry Reding wrote: * linu...@stefanringel.de wrote: From: Stefan Ringellinu...@stefanringel.de

Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-05 Thread Thierry Reding
* Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: That means that all we need is to get rid of TM6000_QUIRK_NO_USB_DELAY. I've just reviewed my patches again and it seems that no-USB-delay quirk patch was only partially applied. The actual location where it was introduced was in tm6000_read_write_usb() to allow

Re: [PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-12-04 Thread Thierry Reding
* linu...@stefanringel.de wrote: From: Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de Signed-off-by: Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de Your commit message needs more details. Why do you think this is a bugfix? Also this commit seems to effectively revert (and then partially reimplement) a patch

[PATCH 3/5] tm6000: bugfix interrupt reset

2011-11-28 Thread linuxtv
From: Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de Signed-off-by: Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de --- drivers/media/video/tm6000/tm6000-core.c | 49 - drivers/media/video/tm6000/tm6000-video.c | 21 ++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)