Re: [PATCH 3/7] si2157: Add hybrid tuner support

Hi Mauro, On 2018-03-06 06:24, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hi Brad, > > As patches 1 and 2 are independent of this one, and should be backward > compatible, I'm applying them, but I have issues with this one too :-) > > Em Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:48:35 -0600 > Brad Love

Re: [PATCH 3/7] si2157: Add hybrid tuner support

Hi Brad, As patches 1 and 2 are independent of this one, and should be backward compatible, I'm applying them, but I have issues with this one too :-) Em Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:48:35 -0600 Brad Love escreveu: > On 2018-01-15 23:05, Antti Palosaari wrote: > > Hello > > So

Re: [PATCH 3/7] si2157: Add hybrid tuner support

On 2018-01-15 23:05, Antti Palosaari wrote: > Hello > So the use case is to share single tuner with multiple demodulators? > Why don't just register single tuner and pass that info to multiple > demods? > > Antti Hello Antti, It was done this way because of lack of knowledge of other ways. The

Re: [PATCH 3/7] si2157: Add hybrid tuner support

Hello So the use case is to share single tuner with multiple demodulators? Why don't just register single tuner and pass that info to multiple demods? Antti On 01/12/2018 06:19 PM, Brad Love wrote: Add ability to share a tuner amongst demodulators. Addtional demods are attached using

[PATCH 3/7] si2157: Add hybrid tuner support

Add ability to share a tuner amongst demodulators. Addtional demods are attached using hybrid_tuner_instance_list. The changes are equivalent to moving all of probe to _attach. Results are backwards compatible with current usage. If the tuner is acquired via attach, then .release cleans state.