On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 12:24:33AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> However, we (as in the V4L2 community, and me personally) would have
> appreciated to be CC'ed on the proposal. As you might know we already had a
> solution for this problem, albeit V4L2-specific, in drivers/media/v4l2-
> core/v
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:22:14PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> (CC'ing Philipp Zabel who might be able to provide feedback as a user of the
> component framework)
>
> Could you please have a look at the questions below and provide an answer
> when
> you'll have time ? I'd
Hi Russell,
(CC'ing Philipp Zabel who might be able to provide feedback as a user of the
component framework)
Could you please have a look at the questions below and provide an answer when
you'll have time ? I'd like to bridge the gap between the component and the
V4L2 asynchronous registratio
Hi Russell,
Time for me to jump in. The more, the merrier I suppose.
On Wednesday 26 February 2014 22:19:39 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:00:25PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi Russell
> >
> > (I suspect this my email will be rejected by ALKML too like
Hi Russell,
Sorry for a long delay.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[snip]
> Better bindings for imx-drm are currently being worked on. Philipp
> Zabel of Pengutronix is currently looking at it, and has posted many
> RFC patches on this very subject, including moving the V
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:00:25PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Russell
>
> (I suspect this my email will be rejected by ALKML too like other my
> recent emails, but at least other MLs will pick it up and individual CCs
> too, so, if replying, maybe it would be good to keep my entire
Hi Russell
(I suspect this my email will be rejected by ALKML too like other my
recent emails, but at least other MLs will pick it up and individual CCs
too, so, if replying, maybe it would be good to keep my entire reply, all
the more that it's going to be very short)
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Russ
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:57:21PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> I started to use your code (which works fine, thanks), and it avoids a
> lot of problems, especially, about probe_defer in a DT context.
>
> I was wondering if your componentised mechanism could be extended to the
> devices def
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:46:56 +
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:04:30AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > I've chatted a bit with Hans Verkuil about this topic at fosdem and
> > apparently both v4l and alsa have something like this already in their
> > helper librarie
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:04:30AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I've chatted a bit with Hans Verkuil about this topic at fosdem and
> apparently both v4l and alsa have something like this already in their
> helper libraries. Adding more people as fyi in case they want to
> switch to the new driver
I've chatted a bit with Hans Verkuil about this topic at fosdem and
apparently both v4l and alsa have something like this already in their
helper libraries. Adding more people as fyi in case they want to
switch to the new driver core stuff from Russell.
-Daniel
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Rus
11 matches
Mail list logo
