Re: [PATCH v2] V4L/DVB: mx1-camera: compile fix

2010-03-12 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Or maybe even we shall remap those registers? > Well, they are remapped, don't they? Otherwise IO_ADDRESS wouldn't > work. Yes, they are (statically, I presume), but not in _this_ driver... Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakh

Re: [PATCH v2] V4L/DVB: mx1-camera: compile fix

2010-03-12 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello, On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:22:31AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > This is a regression of > > > > 7d58289 (mx1: prefix SOC specific defines with MX1_ and deprecate old > > names) > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > > --- >

Re: [PATCH v2] V4L/DVB: mx1-camera: compile fix

2010-03-12 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Uwe On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > This is a regression of > > 7d58289 (mx1: prefix SOC specific defines with MX1_ and deprecate old > names) > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > --- > drivers/media/video/mx1_camera.c | 12 +++- > 1 files changed, 7 inserti

[PATCH v2] V4L/DVB: mx1-camera: compile fix

2010-03-05 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
This is a regression of 7d58289 (mx1: prefix SOC specific defines with MX1_ and deprecate old names) Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- drivers/media/video/mx1_camera.c | 12 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mx1_camera.c