Em 28-02-2011 15:20, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
Em 28-02-2011 12:47, Jiri Slaby escreveu:
On 02/28/2011 03:53 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:37:02AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
mem-dma_handle is a dma address obtained by dma_alloc_coherent which
needn't be a
On 03/21/2011 11:43 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As I got no return, and the patch looked sane, I've reviewed the comment
myself,
Aha, I forgot to send it. Sorry.
It looks OK.
Author: Jiri Slaby jsl...@suse.cz
Date: Mon Feb 28 06:37:02 2011 -0300
[media] V4L: videobuf, don't
mem-dma_handle is a dma address obtained by dma_alloc_coherent which
needn't be a physical address in presence of IOMMU. So ensure we are
remapping (remap_pfn_range) the right page in __videobuf_mmap_mapper
by using virt_to_phys(mem-vaddr) and not mem-dma_handle.
While at it, use PFN_DOWN instead
Hi Jiri,
On Monday 28 February 2011 10:37:02 Jiri Slaby wrote:
mem-dma_handle is a dma address obtained by dma_alloc_coherent which
needn't be a physical address in presence of IOMMU. So ensure we are
remapping (remap_pfn_range) the right page in __videobuf_mmap_mapper
by using
On 02/28/2011 11:53 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 28 February 2011 10:37:02 Jiri Slaby wrote:
mem-dma_handle is a dma address obtained by dma_alloc_coherent which
needn't be a physical address in presence of IOMMU. So ensure we are
remapping (remap_pfn_range) the right page in
Hi Jiri,
On Monday 28 February 2011 16:07:43 Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 02/28/2011 11:53 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 28 February 2011 10:37:02 Jiri Slaby wrote:
mem-dma_handle is a dma address obtained by dma_alloc_coherent which
needn't be a physical address in presence of IOMMU. So
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:37:02AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
mem-dma_handle is a dma address obtained by dma_alloc_coherent which
needn't be a physical address in presence of IOMMU. So ensure we are
Can you add a comment why you are fixing it? Is there a bug report for this?
Under what
On 02/28/2011 04:14 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Jiri,
On Monday 28 February 2011 16:07:43 Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 02/28/2011 11:53 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 28 February 2011 10:37:02 Jiri Slaby wrote:
mem-dma_handle is a dma address obtained by dma_alloc_coherent which
needn't
On 02/28/2011 03:53 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:37:02AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
mem-dma_handle is a dma address obtained by dma_alloc_coherent which
needn't be a physical address in presence of IOMMU. So ensure we are
Can you add a comment why you are fixing
Em 28-02-2011 12:47, Jiri Slaby escreveu:
On 02/28/2011 03:53 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:37:02AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
mem-dma_handle is a dma address obtained by dma_alloc_coherent which
needn't be a physical address in presence of IOMMU. So ensure we are
10 matches
Mail list logo