Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] v4l: Correct the ordering of LSBs of the 10-bit raw packed formats

2016-06-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 06/20/2016 10:38 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote: > Hi Hans. > > On 20/06/16 18:03, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On 06/20/2016 06:20 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: >>> The 10-bit packed raw bayer format documented that the data of the first >>> pixel of a four-pixel group was found in the first byte and the two

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] v4l: Correct the ordering of LSBs of the 10-bit raw packed formats

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Stevenson
Hi Hans. On 20/06/16 18:03, Hans Verkuil wrote: On 06/20/2016 06:20 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: The 10-bit packed raw bayer format documented that the data of the first pixel of a four-pixel group was found in the first byte and the two highest bits of the fifth byte. This was not entirely

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] v4l: Correct the ordering of LSBs of the 10-bit raw packed formats

2016-06-20 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 06/20/2016 06:20 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > The 10-bit packed raw bayer format documented that the data of the first > pixel of a four-pixel group was found in the first byte and the two > highest bits of the fifth byte. This was not entirely correct. The two > bits in the fifth byte are the two

[PATCH v2 1/7] v4l: Correct the ordering of LSBs of the 10-bit raw packed formats

2016-06-20 Thread Sakari Ailus
The 10-bit packed raw bayer format documented that the data of the first pixel of a four-pixel group was found in the first byte and the two highest bits of the fifth byte. This was not entirely correct. The two bits in the fifth byte are the two lowest bits. The second pixel occupies the second