On 02/02/2017 02:35 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
However, "*vfd" contains a struct device, and you _correctly_ set the
release function for "*vfd" to video_device_release via camif_videodev.
However, if you try to rmmod imx-media, then you end up with a kernel
warning that you're
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 06:11:38PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> +struct camif_priv {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct video_devicevfd;
You can't do this.
> +static struct video_device camif_videodev = {
> + .fops = _fops,
> + .ioctl_ops =
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:36:53PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> On 01/31/2017 02:04 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >I don't want master though, I want v4.10-rc1, and if I ask for that
> >it tells me it knows nothing about v4.10-rc1, despite the fact that's
> >a tag in the mainline
On 01/31/2017 03:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:36:53PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
On 01/31/2017 02:04 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I don't want master though, I want v4.10-rc1, and if I ask for that
it tells me it knows nothing about v4.10-rc1,
On 01/31/2017 02:04 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:55:29PM +, Ian Arkver wrote:
On 31/01/17 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
On 01/31/2017 05:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On 31/01/17 22:04, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:55:29PM +, Ian Arkver wrote:
On 31/01/17 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
On 01/31/2017 05:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:55:29PM +, Ian Arkver wrote:
> On 31/01/17 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> >>On 01/31/2017 05:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Hans
On 31/01/17 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
On 01/31/2017 05:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Should be set to something like
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> On 01/31/2017 05:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>Should be set to something like 'platform:imx-media-camif'. v4l2-compliance
> >>should complain about
On 01/31/2017 05:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Should be set to something like 'platform:imx-media-camif'. v4l2-compliance
should complain about this.
... and more.
Right, in version 3 that you are working with, no
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Should be set to something like 'platform:imx-media-camif'. v4l2-compliance
> should complain about this.
... and more.
Driver Info:
Driver name : imx-media-camif
Card type : imx-media-camif
Bus info
On 01/20/2017 06:38 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 01/07/2017 03:11 AM, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
+static int vidioc_querycap(struct file *file, void *fh,
+ struct v4l2_capability *cap)
+{
+ strncpy(cap->driver, "imx-media-camif", sizeof(cap->driver) - 1);
+
On 01/07/2017 03:11 AM, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> This is the camera interface driver that provides the v4l2
> user interface. Frames can be received from various sources:
>
> - directly from SMFC for capturing unconverted images directly from
> camera sensors.
>
> - from the IC pre-process
This is the camera interface driver that provides the v4l2
user interface. Frames can be received from various sources:
- directly from SMFC for capturing unconverted images directly from
camera sensors.
- from the IC pre-process encode task.
- from the IC pre-process viewfinder task.
- from
14 matches
Mail list logo
