On 02/15/2018 07:52 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 08/02/18 17:39, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi Sakari,
On 02/07/2018 03:59 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Add suffix ULL to constants 1 and 100 in order to give
On 08/02/18 17:39, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On 02/07/2018 03:59 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Hi Gustavo,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> Add suffix ULL to constants 1 and 100 in order to give the
>>> compiler complete
Hi Sakari,
On 02/07/2018 03:59 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Add suffix ULL to constants 1 and 100 in order to give the
compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use.
Notice that these
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Add suffix ULL to constants 1 and 100 in order to give the
> compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use.
> Notice that these constants are used in contexts that expect
> expressions of
Add suffix ULL to constants 1 and 100 in order to give the
compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use.
Notice that these constants are used in contexts that expect
expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned).
The following expressions:
(u64)(fi->interval.numerator *
