Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:57:12PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:20:19 -0700 Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com escreveu: From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com Mauro, since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer and depends

[PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com Mauro, since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer and depends on an x86 symbol that went through Boris' tree are you OK in it going through Boris' tree? Boris, provided the outcome of the above maintainer's preference for you to merge

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:49:59AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com Mauro, since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer and depends on an x86 symbol that went through Boris' tree are you OK in it going through Boris' tree? Sorry I

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-08 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:20:19 -0700 Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com escreveu: From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com Mauro, since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer and depends on an x86 symbol that went through Boris' tree are you OK in it going through

[PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-08 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com Mauro, since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer and depends on an x86 symbol that went through Boris' tree are you OK in it going through Boris' tree? Boris, provided the outcome of the above maintainer's preference for you to merge