On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 05:06:41 +0200,
Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>
> On Sep 10 2016 22:41, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:25:31 +0200,
> > Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sep 10 2016 15:44, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:50:14 +0200,
> >>> Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
On Sep 10 2016 22:41, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:25:31 +0200,
> Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 10 2016 15:44, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:50:14 +0200,
>>> Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
Hi,
Currently, TLV related protocol is not shared to
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:25:31 +0200,
Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>
> On Sep 10 2016 15:44, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:50:14 +0200,
> > Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Currently, TLV related protocol is not shared to user land. This is not
> >> good in a point of
On Sep 10 2016 15:44, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:50:14 +0200,
> Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently, TLV related protocol is not shared to user land. This is not
>> good in a point of application interfaces, because application developers
>> can't realize the
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:50:14 +0200,
Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently, TLV related protocol is not shared to user land. This is not
> good in a point of application interfaces, because application developers
> can't realize the protocol just to see UAPI headers.
>
> For this
Hi,
Currently, TLV related protocol is not shared to user land. This is not
good in a point of application interfaces, because application developers
can't realize the protocol just to see UAPI headers.
For this purpose, this patchset moves all of macros related to TLV to UAPI
header. As a
