Adam Baker wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Both patches look good to me.
A complaint about lack of documentation wouldn't have gone amiss.
Er, good point.
Regards,
Hans
Unfortunately having just remembered that I should have done that I'm
struggling to get the curre
On Monday 16 March 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Both patches look good to me.
A complaint about lack of documentation wouldn't have gone amiss.
Unfortunately having just remembered that I should have done that I'm
struggling to get the current docbook to compile (So far I've suffered Ubuntu
not
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Adam Baker wrote:
Hi all,
I've finally got round to writing a sample patch to support the proposed
mechanism of reporting sensor orientation to user space. It is split into 2
parts, part 1 contains the kernel changes and part 2 the libv4l changes.
Adam Baker wrote:
Hi all,
I've finally got round to writing a sample patch to support the proposed
mechanism of reporting sensor orientation to user space. It is split into 2
parts, part 1 contains the kernel changes and part 2 the libv4l changes. In
order to keep the patch simple I haven't a
Hi all,
I've finally got round to writing a sample patch to support the proposed
mechanism of reporting sensor orientation to user space. It is split into 2
parts, part 1 contains the kernel changes and part 2 the libv4l changes. In
order to keep the patch simple I haven't attempted to add supp
