On 11/12/2018 08:07 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:56 PM Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>
>> As was discussed here (among other places):
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440
>>
>> using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is
>> not a good
Hi Hans,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:56 PM Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> As was discussed here (among other places):
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440
>
> using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is
> not a good idea. A better idea is to use 'cookies' (a better name is
>
On 11/09/18 10:56, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> As was discussed here (among other places):
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440
>
> using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is
> not a good idea. A better idea is to use 'cookies' (a better name is
> welcome!) where the
As was discussed here (among other places):
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440
using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is
not a good idea. A better idea is to use 'cookies' (a better name is
welcome!) where the application can assign a u64 cookie to an output
buffer,
