On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
[snip]
> So if you can comment on this and see if the DT bindings fits your,
> would be very useful.
>
Sorry, I wanted to write "if the DT bindings fits your needs, it would
be very useful".
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscrib
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 01:55 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> First pass at getting subdevs from DT ports and endpoints.
>>
>> The _get_pdata() function was larely inspired by (i.e. stolen from)
>> am437x-vpfe.c
>>
>> Questions:
>> - Legacy board fi
On 10/26/2016 01:55 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> First pass at getting subdevs from DT ports and endpoints.
>
> The _get_pdata() function was larely inspired by (i.e. stolen from)
> am437x-vpfe.c
>
> Questions:
> - Legacy board file passes subdev input & output routes via pdata
> (e.g. tvp514x svi
First pass at getting subdevs from DT ports and endpoints.
The _get_pdata() function was larely inspired by (i.e. stolen from)
am437x-vpfe.c
Questions:
- Legacy board file passes subdev input & output routes via pdata
(e.g. tvp514x svideo or composite selection.) How is this supposed
to be d
