Re: [patch] [media] af9013: change to

2012-01-09 Thread Antti Palosaari
Clear bug, I will test it later when applied to master if not already. Thanks! Acked-by: Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi On 01/05/2012 08:23 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: This is just a cleanup, it doesn't change how the code works. These are compound conditions and not bitwise operations so it

Re: [patch] [media] af9013: change to

2012-01-09 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:40:49PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: Clear bug, I will test it later when applied to master if not already. Thanks! You're welcome, but it's not a bug because (1 1 0) is the same as (1 1 0) but if one of them wasn't a bool it would be a problem. The other

[patch] [media] af9013: change to

2012-01-04 Thread Dan Carpenter
This is just a cleanup, it doesn't change how the code works. These are compound conditions and not bitwise operations so it should be and not . Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/af9013.c index