Su Jiaquan wrote:
>Hi Hans,
>
>On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Hans Verkuil
>wrote:
>> On Wed 21 August 2013 12:56:21 Su Jiaquan wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> Recently when we enable LOCKDEP in our kernel, it detected a
>"possible
>>> recursive locking". As we check the code, we found that it's ju
Hi Hans,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Wed 21 August 2013 12:56:21 Su Jiaquan wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> Recently when we enable LOCKDEP in our kernel, it detected a "possible
>> recursive locking". As we check the code, we found that it's just a
>> false alarm, the conc
On Wed 21 August 2013 12:56:21 Su Jiaquan wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Recently when we enable LOCKDEP in our kernel, it detected a "possible
> recursive locking". As we check the code, we found that it's just a
> false alarm, the conceived scenario should never happen. Shell I
> submit a patch to suppre
Hi Hans,
Recently when we enable LOCKDEP in our kernel, it detected a "possible
recursive locking". As we check the code, we found that it's just a
false alarm, the conceived scenario should never happen. Shell I
submit a patch to suppress it?
[5.438446] c0 1 (swapper/0) =
