On 06/17/2009 08:11 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
sn9c102
Supports a large number of cams also supported by gspca's sonixb / sonixj
driver, we're using
#ifdef macros to detect if both are being build at the same time to
include usb-id's only
in one of the 2.
Btw, it wou
Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> sn9c102
>>> Supports a large number of cams also supported by gspca's sonixb / sonixj
>>> driver, we're using
>>> #ifdef macros to detect if both are being build at the same time to
>>> include usb-id's only
>>> in one of the 2.
>> Btw, it would be interesting to wor
Hi,
On 06/17/2009 05:23 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:41:23 +0200
Hans de Goede escreveu:
Hi all,
On 06/17/2009 04:28 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:59:59 +0200
Hans de Goede escreveu:
As for usbvideo that supports (amongst others) t
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:41:23 +0200
Hans de Goede escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> On 06/17/2009 04:28 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:59:59 +0200
> > Hans de Goede escreveu:
> >
>
>
>
> >>
> >> As for usbvideo that supports (amongst others) the st6422 (from the out of
> >
Hi all,
On 06/17/2009 04:28 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:59:59 +0200
Hans de Goede escreveu:
As for usbvideo that supports (amongst others) the st6422 (from the out of tree
qc-usb-messenger driver), but only one usb-id ??. I'm currently finishing up
adding
st6
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:59:59 +0200
Hans de Goede escreveu:
>
>
> On 06/17/2009 11:56 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
> > "Hans Verkuil" escreveu:
> >
> >>> I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
> >>> one of them (a crea
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:26:58 +0200 (CEST)
"Hans Verkuil" escreveu:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 09:43 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> >> > I personally think that loosing support for the parallel port
> >> > version is ok given that the parallel port itslef is rapidly
> >> > disappearing, what d
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 09:43 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> > I personally think that loosing support for the parallel port
>> > version is ok given that the parallel port itslef is rapidly
>> > disappearing, what do you think ?
>>
>> I agree wholeheartedly. If we remove pp support, then we can
On 06/17/2009 11:56 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
"Hans Verkuil" escreveu:
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
works with the v4l1 driver currently in
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 09:43 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > I personally think that loosing support for the parallel port
> > version is ok given that the parallel port itslef is rapidly
> > disappearing, what do you think ?
>
> I agree wholeheartedly. If we remove pp support, then we can also rem
> Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
> "Hans Verkuil" escreveu:
>
>> > I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
>> > one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
>> > works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
>> >
>> > One of these d
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:56:21 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
> "Hans Verkuil" escreveu:
>
> > > I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
> > > one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
> > > work
Em Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
"Hans Verkuil" escreveu:
> > I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
> > one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
> > works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
> >
> > One of these days I would
On 06/17/2009 09:43 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
One of these days I would like to convert it to a v4l2 drive
> Hi,
>
> I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
> one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
> works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
>
> One of these days I would like to convert it to a v4l2 driver using
> gspca as basis, this howe
Hi,
I recently have been bying second hand usb webcams left and right
one of them (a creative unknown model) uses the cpia1 chipset, and
works with the v4l1 driver currently in the kernel.
One of these days I would like to convert it to a v4l2 driver using
gspca as basis, this however will cause
16 matches
Mail list logo
