On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:13:12 +0200
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com wrote:
So, if your webcam is in the 99.99% which use the interface 0, use
gspca_dev_probe(), otherwise, YOU know the right interface, so, call
gspca_dev_probe2().
Isn't it also possible that we don't know the
Am 16.09.2011 08:33, schrieb Jean-Francois Moine:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:46:57 +0200
Frank Schäferfschaefer@googlemail.com wrote:
For webcam devices, the interface class is meaningful only when set to
USB_CLASS_VIDEO (UVC). Otherwise, I saw many different values.
Does that mean that
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:46:57 +0200
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com wrote:
For webcam devices, the interface class is meaningful only when set to
USB_CLASS_VIDEO (UVC). Otherwise, I saw many different values.
Does that mean that there are devices out in the wild that report for
Am 14.09.2011 08:25, schrieb Jean-Francois Moine:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:14:28 +0200
Frank Schäferfschaefer@googlemail.com wrote:
I have a question about the following code in gspca.c:
in function gspca_dev_probe(...):
...
/* the USB video interface must be the first one */
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:14:28 +0200
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com wrote:
I have a question about the following code in gspca.c:
in function gspca_dev_probe(...):
...
/* the USB video interface must be the first one */
if (dev-config-desc.bNumInterfaces != 1
Hi,
I have a question about the following code in gspca.c:
in function gspca_dev_probe(...):
...
/* the USB video interface must be the first one */
if (dev-config-desc.bNumInterfaces != 1
intf-cur_altsetting-desc.bInterfaceNumber != 0)
return -ENODEV;
...
Is
