RE: [PATCH/RFC 9/9] mt9t031: make the use of the soc-camera client API optional

2009-11-02 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Guennadi, Thanks for the reply. +}; + +static struct soc_camera_ops mt9t031_ops = { + .set_bus_param = mt9t031_set_bus_param, + .query_bus_param= mt9t031_query_bus_param, + .controls = mt9t031_controls, + .num_controls =

RE: [PATCH/RFC 9/9] mt9t031: make the use of the soc-camera client API optional

2009-10-30 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Guennadi, Thanks for your time for updating this driver. But I still don't think it is in a state to be re-used on TI's VPFE platform. Please see below for my comments. Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original

RE: [PATCH/RFC 9/9] mt9t031: make the use of the soc-camera client API optional

2009-10-30 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Guennadi, Thanks for your time for updating this driver. But I still don't think it is in a state to be re-used on TI's VPFE platform. Please see below for my comments. Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc.