On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 20 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>> >> I think we can check inside the deferred_probe_work_func()
>> >> if
On Wednesday 20 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
> >> I think we can check inside the deferred_probe_work_func()
> >> if the dev->probe function pointer is equal to platform_drv_prob
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>> I think we can check inside the deferred_probe_work_func()
>> if the dev->probe function pointer is equal to platform_drv_probe_fail().
>
> I think it's too late by then, because that wou
On Wednesday 20 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
> I think we can check inside the deferred_probe_work_func()
> if the dev->probe function pointer is equal to platform_drv_probe_fail().
I think it's too late by then, because that would only warn if we try to probe
it again, but when platform_dri
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 19 March 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> Hmm, so we may have drivers that (now) work perfectly fine with
>> >> mod
On Tuesday 19 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 March 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Hmm, so we may have drivers that (now) work perfectly fine with
> >> module_platform_driver_probe()/platform_driver_probe(), but will
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 March 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hmm, so we may have drivers that (now) work perfectly fine with
>> module_platform_driver_probe()/platform_driver_probe(), but will start
>> failing suddenly in the future?
>
> They will
On Tuesday 19 March 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hmm, so we may have drivers that (now) work perfectly fine with
> module_platform_driver_probe()/platform_driver_probe(), but will start
> failing suddenly in the future?
They will fail if someone changes the initialization order. That would
al
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Fabio Porcedda
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 18 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> > On Monday 18 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>>> >> Since by using
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 18 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Monday 18 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>> >> Since by using platform_driver_probe() the function
>> >> ep93xx_pwm_prob
On Monday 18 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 18 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
> >> Since by using platform_driver_probe() the function
> >> ep93xx_pwm_probe() is freed after initialization,
> >> is better to use modul
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 18 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>> Since by using platform_driver_probe() the function
>> ep93xx_pwm_probe() is freed after initialization,
>> is better to use module_platform_drive_probe().
>> IMHO i don't see any good reaso
On Monday 18 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
> Since by using platform_driver_probe() the function
> ep93xx_pwm_probe() is freed after initialization,
> is better to use module_platform_drive_probe().
> IMHO i don't see any good reason to use module_platform_driver() for
> this driver.
As I com
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 March 2013, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> Arnd,
>>
>> Ill look at converting the ep93xx pwm driver to the PWM subsystem. The only
>> issue is
>> the current driver exposes a sysfs interface that I think is not available
>> in tha
On Friday 15 March 2013, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> Arnd,
>
> Ill look at converting the ep93xx pwm driver to the PWM subsystem. The only
> issue is
> the current driver exposes a sysfs interface that I think is not available in
> that subsystem.
You can probably keep providing that interface i
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>> >> * Regarding the use of module_platform_driver_probe, I'm a little worried
>> >> about
>> >> the interactions with deferred probing. I don't think there are any
>> >> regressions,
>> >>
On Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 14 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>> This patch converts the drivers to use the
>> module_platform_driver_probe() macro which makes the code smaller and
>> a bit simpler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda
>> Cc: Greg Kro
On Friday 15 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
> >> * Regarding the use of module_platform_driver_probe, I'm a little worried
> >> about
> >> the interactions with deferred probing. I don't think there are any
> >> regressions,
> >> but we should probably make people aware that one cannot ret
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:58:05PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Thursday 14 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>> > This patch converts the drivers to use the
>> > module_platform_driver_probe() macro which makes the code smaller and
>> >
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:58:05PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 14 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
> > This patch converts the drivers to use the
> > module_platform_driver_probe() macro which makes the code smaller and
> > a bit simpler.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda
> > C
On Thursday 14 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
> This patch converts the drivers to use the
> module_platform_driver_probe() macro which makes the code smaller and
> a bit simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
> drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.c
21 matches
Mail list logo
