Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehabmche...@infradead.org wrote: Em Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:27:40 -0500 Karicheri, Muralidharan m-kariche...@ti.com escreveu: Kevin Mauro, Do I need to wait or this can be resolved by either of you for my work to proceed? Murali, If I fix your patch in order to apply it on my tree, backporting it to the old arch header files, we'll have merge troubles upstream, when Kevin merge his changes. It will also mean that he'll need to apply a diff patch on his tree, in order to convert the patch to the new headers, and that git bisect may break. I might merge his tree here, but this means that, if he needs to rebase his tree (and sometimes people need to rebase their linux-next trees), I'll have troubles here, and I'll loose my work. So, the better solution is if he could apply this specific patch, merging his tree upstream before your patches. OK, this is applied to DaVinci git master, and will add it to my 'for-next' branch which will be pulled into linux-next. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Kevin, How do we handle this? Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 new phone: 301-407-9583 Old Phone : 301-515-3736 (will be deprecated) email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [mailto:mche...@infradead.org] Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:10 PM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: Kevin Hilman; Mauro Carvalho Chehab; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver Em Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:27:40 -0500 Karicheri, Muralidharan m-kariche...@ti.com escreveu: Kevin Mauro, Do I need to wait or this can be resolved by either of you for my work to proceed? Murali, If I fix your patch in order to apply it on my tree, backporting it to the old arch header files, we'll have merge troubles upstream, when Kevin merge his changes. It will also mean that he'll need to apply a diff patch on his tree, in order to convert the patch to the new headers, and that git bisect may break. I might merge his tree here, but this means that, if he needs to rebase his tree (and sometimes people need to rebase their linux-next trees), I'll have troubles here, and I'll loose my work. So, the better solution is if he could apply this specific patch, merging his tree upstream before your patches. Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Em Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:27:40 -0500 Karicheri, Muralidharan m-kariche...@ti.com escreveu: Kevin Mauro, Do I need to wait or this can be resolved by either of you for my work to proceed? Murali, If I fix your patch in order to apply it on my tree, backporting it to the old arch header files, we'll have merge troubles upstream, when Kevin merge his changes. It will also mean that he'll need to apply a diff patch on his tree, in order to convert the patch to the new headers, and that git bisect may break. I might merge his tree here, but this means that, if he needs to rebase his tree (and sometimes people need to rebase their linux-next trees), I'll have troubles here, and I'll loose my work. So, the better solution is if he could apply this specific patch, merging his tree upstream before your patches. Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Kevin Mauro, Do I need to wait or this can be resolved by either of you for my work to proceed? Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 new phone: 301-407-9583 Old Phone : 301-515-3736 (will be deprecated) email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [mailto:mche...@infradead.org] Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 12:33 AM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan; Kevin Hilman Cc: Karicheri, Muralidharan; Mauro Carvalho Chehab; linux- me...@vger.kernel.org; khil...@deeprootsystems.com; Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver Em Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:32:07 -0500 Karicheri, Muralidharan m-kariche...@ti.com escreveu: Mauro, Kevin has approved the architecture part of this patch. When can I expect these to be merged to linux-next? Thanks. Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Karicheri, Muralidharan Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:51 PM To: 'Mauro Carvalho Chehab' Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux- open- sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com; Hans Verkuil Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver Mauro, Here are the patches from Chaithrika that I am referring to. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg08254.html There's something wrong with this patch: $ patch -p1 -i 12453a.patch patching file arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] y Hunk #1 succeeded at 52 (offset -11 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 218 with fuzz 1 (offset -70 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 286 with fuzz 2 (offset -14 lines). Hunk #4 FAILED at 293. Hunk #5 succeeded at 254 (offset -79 lines). 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/arm/mach- davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c.rej patching file arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 40 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 550 with fuzz 1 (offset -145 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 866 with fuzz 1 (offset 12 lines). patching file arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/dm646x.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 47 with fuzz 2 (offset 18 lines). It seems that this patch is not based on my linux-next -git tree. Probably, this patch is dependent on some patch at Kevin tree. Kevin, As this patch touches only arch/arm/ stuff, I suspect that we'll have less conflicts if you could merge this one. From my side: Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg07676.html Hmm... the second patch shows that bisect will be broken with the platform changes. This patch should be fold with the one that renamed the field, or before Kconfig/Makefile changes. I've applied this one on my tree, just before the Kbuild patch. Due to the DaVinci dependency order, I'll need to hold the DaVinci patches at the next upstream window to happen after Russell/Kevin trees, to avoid bisect troubles Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Em Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:32:07 -0500 Karicheri, Muralidharan m-kariche...@ti.com escreveu: Mauro, Kevin has approved the architecture part of this patch. When can I expect these to be merged to linux-next? Thanks. Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Karicheri, Muralidharan Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:51 PM To: 'Mauro Carvalho Chehab' Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open- sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com; Hans Verkuil Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver Mauro, Here are the patches from Chaithrika that I am referring to. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg08254.html There's something wrong with this patch: $ patch -p1 -i 12453a.patch patching file arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] y Hunk #1 succeeded at 52 (offset -11 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 218 with fuzz 1 (offset -70 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 286 with fuzz 2 (offset -14 lines). Hunk #4 FAILED at 293. Hunk #5 succeeded at 254 (offset -79 lines). 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c.rej patching file arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 40 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 550 with fuzz 1 (offset -145 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 866 with fuzz 1 (offset 12 lines). patching file arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/dm646x.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 47 with fuzz 2 (offset 18 lines). It seems that this patch is not based on my linux-next -git tree. Probably, this patch is dependent on some patch at Kevin tree. Kevin, As this patch touches only arch/arm/ stuff, I suspect that we'll have less conflicts if you could merge this one. From my side: Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg07676.html Hmm... the second patch shows that bisect will be broken with the platform changes. This patch should be fold with the one that renamed the field, or before Kconfig/Makefile changes. I've applied this one on my tree, just before the Kbuild patch. Due to the DaVinci dependency order, I'll need to hold the DaVinci patches at the next upstream window to happen after Russell/Kevin trees, to avoid bisect troubles Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 01:23:10 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, I have re-send vpfe capture patch. I will re-send vpif patches tomorrow. These patches apply fine. I'll merge them in my v4l-dvb-dm646x tree tonight. Thanks! Hans Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 new phone: 301-407-9583 Old Phone : 301-515-3736 (will be deprecated) email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 4:27 PM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open- sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver On Monday 17 August 2009 22:10:04 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, Would you like the architecture specific changes against v4l-dvb linux- next tree or linux-davinci ? I will rework both the vpfe and vpif patches as per your comment. v4l-dvb linux-next. The current v4l-dvb at least compiles against that one, so that is the most appropriate tree to do the patches against. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 08:49:13 Hans Verkuil wrote: On Tuesday 18 August 2009 01:23:10 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, I have re-send vpfe capture patch. I will re-send vpif patches tomorrow. These patches apply fine. I'll merge them in my v4l-dvb-dm646x tree tonight. Oops, wrong tree. It's v4l-dvb-vpif. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Mauro, I need to send a set of patches for adding vpif capture driver. Currently the linux-next doesn't have the last patch from Chaithrika applied for vpif display. Is it possible to apply this asap so that I can create the vpif capture patch today? Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 new phone: 301-407-9583 Old Phone : 301-515-3736 (will be deprecated) email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:51 AM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open- sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver On Tuesday 18 August 2009 08:49:13 Hans Verkuil wrote: On Tuesday 18 August 2009 01:23:10 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, I have re-send vpfe capture patch. I will re-send vpif patches tomorrow. These patches apply fine. I'll merge them in my v4l-dvb-dm646x tree tonight. Oops, wrong tree. It's v4l-dvb-vpif. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Em Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:06:54 -0500 Karicheri, Muralidharan m-kariche...@ti.com escreveu: Mauro, I need to send a set of patches for adding vpif capture driver. Currently the linux-next doesn't have the last patch from Chaithrika applied for vpif display. Is it possible to apply this asap so that I can create the vpif capture patch today? Sure. Could you please point me what's the patchwork ID(s)[1] of the patch you need me to apply at our development tree and at linux-next? [1] http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/ Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Mauro, Here are the patches from Chaithrika that I am referring to. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg08254.html http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg07676.html Let me know once they are merged... Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 new phone: 301-407-9583 Old Phone : 301-515-3736 (will be deprecated) email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [mailto:mche...@infradead.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:28 PM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open- sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com; Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver Em Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:06:54 -0500 Karicheri, Muralidharan m-kariche...@ti.com escreveu: Mauro, I need to send a set of patches for adding vpif capture driver. Currently the linux-next doesn't have the last patch from Chaithrika applied for vpif display. Is it possible to apply this asap so that I can create the vpif capture patch today? Sure. Could you please point me what's the patchwork ID(s)[1] of the patch you need me to apply at our development tree and at linux-next? [1] http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/ Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Hans, They are applied against davinci tree (also mentioned in the patch). General procedure what I follow is to create platform code against davinci tree and v4l patches against v4l-dvb linux-next tree. The architecture part of linux-next is not up to date. Davinci tree is at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 new phone: 301-407-9583 Old Phone : 301-515-3736 (will be deprecated) email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 8:10 AM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open- sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver On Friday 14 August 2009 23:01:41 m-kariche...@ti.com wrote: From: Muralidharan Karicheri m-kariche...@ti.com This patch makes the following changes:- 1) Modify vpif_subdev_info to add board_info, routing information and vpif interface configuration. Remove addr since it is part of board_info 2) Add code to setup channel mode and input decoder path for vpif capture driver Also incorporated comments against version v0 of the patch series and added a spinlock to protect writes to common registers A quick question: against which git tree are these arch changes applied? I've lost track of that :-) Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
On Monday 17 August 2009 16:52:20 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, They are applied against davinci tree (also mentioned in the patch). General procedure what I follow is to create platform code against davinci tree and v4l patches against v4l-dvb linux-next tree. The architecture part of linux-next is not up to date. Davinci tree is at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git I must have missed the mention of this tree. I have a problem, though, as the current v4l-dvb repository doesn't compile against the linux-davinci git tree. And the only way I can get it to compile is to apply all five patches first. However, the whole tree should still compile after each patch is applied. And that goes wrong with your second patch where the Kconfig and Makefile are modified when the new sources aren't even added yet! What I would like to see is a patch series that starts with one patch that makes the current v4l-dvb tree compile again, then the arch patch is added, then a series of v4l-dvb patches in such an order that everything compiles after each step. Merging this is already complicated enough without breaking compilation in this way. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Hans, Ok. I will rework the patch and send you the same. Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 new phone: 301-407-9583 Old Phone : 301-515-3736 (will be deprecated) email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:47 PM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open- sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver On Monday 17 August 2009 16:52:20 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, They are applied against davinci tree (also mentioned in the patch). General procedure what I follow is to create platform code against davinci tree and v4l patches against v4l-dvb linux-next tree. The architecture part of linux-next is not up to date. Davinci tree is at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git I must have missed the mention of this tree. I have a problem, though, as the current v4l-dvb repository doesn't compile against the linux-davinci git tree. And the only way I can get it to compile is to apply all five patches first. However, the whole tree should still compile after each patch is applied. And that goes wrong with your second patch where the Kconfig and Makefile are modified when the new sources aren't even added yet! What I would like to see is a patch series that starts with one patch that makes the current v4l-dvb tree compile again, then the arch patch is added, then a series of v4l-dvb patches in such an order that everything compiles after each step. Merging this is already complicated enough without breaking compilation in this way. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Hans, Would you like the architecture specific changes against v4l-dvb linux-next tree or linux-davinci ? I will rework both the vpfe and vpif patches as per your comment. Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 new phone: 301-407-9583 Old Phone : 301-515-3736 (will be deprecated) email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:47 PM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open- sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver On Monday 17 August 2009 16:52:20 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, They are applied against davinci tree (also mentioned in the patch). General procedure what I follow is to create platform code against davinci tree and v4l patches against v4l-dvb linux-next tree. The architecture part of linux-next is not up to date. Davinci tree is at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git I must have missed the mention of this tree. I have a problem, though, as the current v4l-dvb repository doesn't compile against the linux-davinci git tree. And the only way I can get it to compile is to apply all five patches first. However, the whole tree should still compile after each patch is applied. And that goes wrong with your second patch where the Kconfig and Makefile are modified when the new sources aren't even added yet! What I would like to see is a patch series that starts with one patch that makes the current v4l-dvb tree compile again, then the arch patch is added, then a series of v4l-dvb patches in such an order that everything compiles after each step. Merging this is already complicated enough without breaking compilation in this way. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
On Monday 17 August 2009 22:10:04 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, Would you like the architecture specific changes against v4l-dvb linux-next tree or linux-davinci ? I will rework both the vpfe and vpif patches as per your comment. v4l-dvb linux-next. The current v4l-dvb at least compiles against that one, so that is the most appropriate tree to do the patches against. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
Hans, I have re-send vpfe capture patch. I will re-send vpif patches tomorrow. Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 new phone: 301-407-9583 Old Phone : 301-515-3736 (will be deprecated) email: m-kariche...@ti.com -Original Message- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 4:27 PM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open- sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver On Monday 17 August 2009 22:10:04 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, Would you like the architecture specific changes against v4l-dvb linux- next tree or linux-davinci ? I will rework both the vpfe and vpif patches as per your comment. v4l-dvb linux-next. The current v4l-dvb at least compiles against that one, so that is the most appropriate tree to do the patches against. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 - 1/5] DaVinci - restructuring code to support vpif capture driver
On Friday 14 August 2009 23:01:41 m-kariche...@ti.com wrote: From: Muralidharan Karicheri m-kariche...@ti.com This patch makes the following changes:- 1) Modify vpif_subdev_info to add board_info, routing information and vpif interface configuration. Remove addr since it is part of board_info 2) Add code to setup channel mode and input decoder path for vpif capture driver Also incorporated comments against version v0 of the patch series and added a spinlock to protect writes to common registers A quick question: against which git tree are these arch changes applied? I've lost track of that :-) Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
