RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] media: atmel-isc: Add safety checks for NULL isc->raw_fmt struct

> On 21.11.2018 16:50, Ken Sloat wrote: > >>> From: Ken Sloat > >>> > >>> In some usages isc->raw_fmt will not be initialized. If this is the > >>> case, it is very possible that a NULL struct de-reference will > >>> occur, as this member is referenced many times. > > > >> Hello Ken, > > > >> Do

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] media: atmel-isc: Add safety checks for NULL isc->raw_fmt struct

On 21.11.2018 16:50, Ken Sloat wrote: >>> From: Ken Sloat >>> >>> In some usages isc->raw_fmt will not be initialized. If this is the >>> case, it is very possible that a NULL struct de-reference will occur, >>> as this member is referenced many times. > >> Hello Ken, > >> Do you have any

RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] media: atmel-isc: Add safety checks for NULL isc->raw_fmt struct

>> From: Ken Sloat >> >> In some usages isc->raw_fmt will not be initialized. If this is the >> case, it is very possible that a NULL struct de-reference will occur, >> as this member is referenced many times. > Hello Ken, > Do you have any confidence that just by avoiding the NULL

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] media: atmel-isc: Add safety checks for NULL isc->raw_fmt struct

On 20.11.2018 22:43, Ken Sloat wrote: > From: Ken Sloat > > In some usages isc->raw_fmt will not be initialized. If this > is the case, it is very possible that a NULL struct de-reference > will occur, as this member is referenced many times. Hello Ken, Do you have any confidence that just