RE: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface

2009-10-12 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface i Murali, Reading through this I noticed that there was one thing that is probably no longer needed: now that we have the SUPPORTS_CUSTOM_TIMING capability there is no need to include

RE: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface

2009-10-12 Thread Hans Verkuil
PM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface On Saturday 10 October 2009 17:07:36 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: Hans, From: Hans Verkuil [hverk

RE: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface

2009-10-10 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Hans, From: Hans Verkuil [hverk...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:43 AM To: Karicheri, Muralidharan Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface i Murali, Reading

Re: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface

2009-10-10 Thread Hans Verkuil
- Support for video timings at the input/output interface i Murali, Reading through this I noticed that there was one thing that is probably no longer needed: now that we have the SUPPORTS_CUSTOM_TIMING capability there is no need to include the CUSTOM preset when enumerating presets. Instead

Re: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface

2009-10-09 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Murali, Reading through this I noticed that there was one thing that is probably no longer needed: now that we have the SUPPORTS_CUSTOM_TIMING capability there is no need to include the CUSTOM preset when enumerating presets. Instead I suggest that the INVALID preset define takes the place of