On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:04:36 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Here it is:
>
> --- linux-git/include/linux/i2c.h.orig2009-06-09 14:53:32.0
> +0200
> +++ linux-git/include/linux/i2c.h 2009-06-09 15:03:24.0 +0200
> @@ -412,6 +412,10 @@
> /* The numbers to use to set I2C bus a
On Monday 08 June 2009 14:39:32 Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:00:48 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c address.
> > Normally you would do it like this:
> >
> > static const unsigned short addrs[] = {
> > addr, I2
Hi Hans,
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:00:48 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c address.
> Normally you would do it like this:
>
> static const unsigned short addrs[] = {
> addr, I2C_CLIENT_END
> };
>
> client = i2c_new_probed_device(adapter,
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 07.06.2009, 16:00 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
> On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 09:25 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Sunday 07 June 2009 00:20:26 Jon Smirl wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > >> > H
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 09:25 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 June 2009 00:20:26 Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a singl
On Sunday 07 June 2009 15:30:50 Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On Sunday 07 June 2009 00:20:26 Jon Smirl wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Hans Verkuil
wrote:
> >>> > Hi all,
> >>> >
> >>>
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Sunday 07 June 2009 00:20:26 Jon Smirl wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c ad
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Sunday 07 June 2009 00:20:26 Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c address.
>> > Normally you would do it like this:
>>
>> Wh
On Sunday 07 June 2009 00:20:26 Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c address.
> > Normally you would do it like this:
>
> Why does video4linux need to probe to find i2c devices? Can't t
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 06.06.2009, 18:20 -0400 schrieb Jon Smirl:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c address.
> > Normally you would do it like this:
>
> Why does video4linux need to probe to find i2c
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c address.
> Normally you would do it like this:
Why does video4linux need to probe to find i2c devices? Can't the
address be determined by knowing the PCI ID of the board?
Em Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:00:48 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c address.
> Normally you would do it like this:
>
> static const unsigned short addrs[] = {
> addr, I2C_CLIENT_END
> };
>
> client = i2c_new_probed_device(ad
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c address.
> Normally you would do it like this:
>
> static const unsigned short addrs[] = {
> addr, I2C_CLIENT_END
> };
>
> client = i2c_new_probed_device(adapter, &info, addrs);
>
> This is a
Hi all,
For video4linux we sometimes need to probe for a single i2c address.
Normally you would do it like this:
static const unsigned short addrs[] = {
addr, I2C_CLIENT_END
};
client = i2c_new_probed_device(adapter, &info, addrs);
This is a bit awkward and I came up with this macro:
14 matches
Mail list logo
