@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the
input/output interface
i Murali,
Reading through this I noticed that there was one thing that is probably
no longer needed: now that we have the SUPPORTS_CUSTOM_TIMING capability
there is no need to include
PM
To: Karicheri, Muralidharan
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the
input/output interface
On Saturday 10 October 2009 17:07:36 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
Hans,
From: Hans Verkuil [hverk
Hans,
From: Hans Verkuil [hverk...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:43 AM
To: Karicheri, Muralidharan
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output
interface
i Murali,
Reading
0x0004
4) Removed negative Polarity masks
5) Added issue #7 for camera sensor frame size/frame rate setting.
RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface
Version : 1.1
for camera sensor frame size/frame rate setting.
RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output interface
Version : 1.1
Background
---
Currently v4l2 specification supports capturing video
IOCTL.
#define V4L2_SUPPORTS_STD0x0004
4) Removed negative Polarity masks
5) Added issue #7 for camera sensor frame size/frame rate setting.
RFC (v1.1): V4L - Support for video timings
