On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 10:51 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 22:39 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Andy,
You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
succeeded in creating an image which resembles your
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 10:51 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 22:39 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Andy,
You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
succeeded in
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 22:39 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Andy,
You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
succeeded in creating an image which resembles your test picture by
extracting the frame data for one frame, tacking on a header, and running
hex2bin on
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 22:39 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Andy,
You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
succeeded in creating an image which resembles your test picture by
extracting the frame data for one frame, tacking on
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 20:04 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Sure looks that way. I took a closer look at the lines starting with ff ff
ff ff strings, and I found a couple more things. Here are several lines
from an extract from that snoop, consisting
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 10:42 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
The more I dig into this, the more I think (hope or wish?) the stuff in
the usb snoop logs looks MJPEG.
I started looking at an AVI file that I recorded with the camera. It
looks like a
Andy,
You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
succeeded in creating an image which resembles your test picture by
extracting the frame data for one frame, tacking on a header, and running
hex2bin on the combined file. I did not get the thing quite right, because
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:38 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Now it is using the other pair of endpoints, 0x03 and 0x84.
H. I wonder if we can use them anyway, without being connected in
webcam mode.
Nope. That was the previously mentioned bug in the Linux mass storage
driver.
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:38 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Now it is using the other pair of endpoints, 0x03 and 0x84.
H. I wonder if we can use them anyway, without being connected in
webcam mode.
Nope. That was the previously mentioned bug
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 15:23 -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:38 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Now it is using the other pair of endpoints, 0x03 and 0x84.
H. I wonder if we can use them anyway, without being connected in
webcam mode.
Nope. That was the
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 15:23 -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:38 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Now it is using the other pair of endpoints, 0x03 and 0x84.
H. I wonder if we can use them anyway, without being connected in
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 20:04 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Sure looks that way. I took a closer look at the lines starting with ff ff
ff ff strings, and I found a couple more things. Here are several lines
from an extract from that snoop, consisting of what appear to be
consecutive SOF
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
Interesting. To answer your question, I have no idea off the top of my
head. I do have what seems to be a similar camera. It is
Bus 005 Device 006:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
Interesting. To answer your question, I have no idea off the top of my
head. I
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
Interesting. To answer your question, I have
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
Interesting. To answer your question, I have
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 19:26 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009,
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 19:26 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
My daughter just got one of these toy digital video recorder webcam
unit.
It normally shows up as a mass storage drive.
If I hold down the shutter button while connecting the USB cable, the
camera LCD show a webcam mode icon and it shows up as a
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
Interesting. To answer your question, I have no idea off the top of my
head. I do have what seems to be a similar camera. It is
Bus 005 Device 006: ID 0979:0371 Jeilin Technology
20 matches
Mail list logo
