On 05/09/2014 03:46 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:57:13PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 05/08/2014 11:04 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> Heippa!
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:57:11PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
What is preferred way implement controls
Hi Hans,
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:57:13PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 05/08/2014 11:04 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Heippa!
> >
> > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:57:11PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >> What is preferred way implement controls that could have some known
> >> unit or unknown u
On 05/08/2014 11:04 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Heippa!
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:57:11PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
>> What is preferred way implement controls that could have some known
>> unit or unknown unit? For example for gain controls, I would like to
>> offer gain in unit of dB (dec
Heippa!
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:57:11PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> What is preferred way implement controls that could have some known
> unit or unknown unit? For example for gain controls, I would like to
> offer gain in unit of dB (decibel) and also some unknown driver
> specific unit. S
Moikka
What is preferred way implement controls that could have some known unit
or unknown unit? For example for gain controls, I would like to offer
gain in unit of dB (decibel) and also some unknown driver specific unit.
Should I two controls, one for each unit?
Like that
V4L2_CID_RF_TUNER
Moikka
What is preferred way implement controls that could have some known unit
or unknown unit? For example for gain controls, I would like to offer
gain in unit of dB (decibel) and also some unknown driver specific unit.
Should I two controls, one for each unit?
Like that
V4L2_CID_RF_TUNER
