Re: VIDIOC_G_STD, VIDIOC_S_STD, VIDIO_C_ENUMSTD for outputs

2010-05-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 22 May 2010 19:21:32 Ian Armstrong wrote: On Saturday 22 May 2010, Andy Walls wrote: On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 15:06 +0100, Andre Draszik wrote: Hi, As per the spec, the above ioctl codes are defined for inputs only - it would be useful if there were similar codes for

Re: VIDIOC_G_STD, VIDIOC_S_STD, VIDIO_C_ENUMSTD for outputs

2010-05-23 Thread Andre Draszik
Hi, On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: On Saturday 22 May 2010 19:21:32 Ian Armstrong wrote: On Saturday 22 May 2010, Andy Walls wrote: On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 15:06 +0100, Andre Draszik wrote: Some thoughts: 1. to me it appears that the ivtv driver

Re: VIDIOC_G_STD, VIDIOC_S_STD, VIDIO_C_ENUMSTD for outputs

2010-05-23 Thread Ian Armstrong
On Sunday 23 May 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 22 May 2010 19:21:32 Ian Armstrong wrote: On Saturday 22 May 2010, Andy Walls wrote: Some thoughts: 1. to me it appears that the ivtv driver looks like it ties the output standard to the input standard currently (probably due

VIDIOC_G_STD, VIDIOC_S_STD, VIDIO_C_ENUMSTD for outputs

2010-05-22 Thread Andre Draszik
Hi, As per the spec, the above ioctl codes are defined for inputs only - it would be useful if there were similar codes for outputs. I therefore propose to add the following: VIDIOC_G_OUTPUT_STD VIDIOC_S_OUTPUT_STD VIDIOC_ENUM_OUTPUT_STD which would behave similar to the above, but for output

Re: VIDIOC_G_STD, VIDIOC_S_STD, VIDIO_C_ENUMSTD for outputs

2010-05-22 Thread Andy Walls
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 15:06 +0100, Andre Draszik wrote: Hi, As per the spec, the above ioctl codes are defined for inputs only - it would be useful if there were similar codes for outputs. I therefore propose to add the following: VIDIOC_G_OUTPUT_STD VIDIOC_S_OUTPUT_STD

Re: VIDIOC_G_STD, VIDIOC_S_STD, VIDIO_C_ENUMSTD for outputs

2010-05-22 Thread Ian Armstrong
On Saturday 22 May 2010, Andy Walls wrote: On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 15:06 +0100, Andre Draszik wrote: Hi, As per the spec, the above ioctl codes are defined for inputs only - it would be useful if there were similar codes for outputs. I therefore propose to add the following: