Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
2. The above means, I'll have to maintain and update my patches for a
whole 2.6.31 development cycle. In this time I'll try to update and upload
them as a quilt patch series and announce it on the list a couple
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
2. The above means, I'll have to maintain and update my patches for a
whole 2.6.31 development cycle. In this time I'll try to update and upload
them as a quilt
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
2. The above means, I'll have to maintain and update my patches for a
whole 2.6.31 development cycle. In this time I'll try to update and upload
them as a quilt patch series and announce it on the list a couple of
times.
As promised, I
Hi all
for those interested here's a (not so) short status report and a proposed
roadmap for general soc-camera development, and, of course, its ongoing
conversion to v4l2-subdev API.
1. v4l2-subdev conversion. I have posted several versions of the
conversion patch series to the list, of
Hi Guennadi,
Let me start with a big Thank You! for all your hard work on this! Much
appreciated!
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 18:45:36 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi all
for those interested here's a (not so) short status report and a proposed
roadmap for general soc-camera development, and,
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:49:23 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 18:45:36 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
[snip]
3. This also means, development will become more difficult, new
features and drivers will only be accepted on
Em Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:09:07 +0200
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
1.4. this is the actual conversion to v4l2-subdev. It depends on some
bits and pieces in the v4l2-subdev framework, which are still in progress
(e.g. v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board), I believe (Hans, am I right? or
