Re: libv4l release: 0.5.97: the whitebalance release!

2009-04-16 Thread Gilles Gigan
Hans, I have tested libv4lconvert with a PCI hauppauge hvr1300 DVB-T and found that v4lconvert_create() returns NULL. The problem comes from the shm_open calls in v4lcontrol_create() in libv4lcontrol.c (lines 187 190). libv4lconvert constructs the shared memory name based on the video device's

Re: [linux-dvb] DVB-T USB dib0700 device recomendations?

2009-04-16 Thread covert covert
Thats wierd. So the usb controler on the Nova-TD and the host controler on the SB700 are incompatible? I tried a few different USB tuners with a SB700 based motherboard until I found out the drivers where not up to scratch for the USB on the SB700 and caused a lot of dvb-usb: bulk message

Re: libv4l release: 0.5.97: the whitebalance release!

2009-04-16 Thread Gilles Gigan
Hans, The patch fixes the problem. Gilles On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/16/2009 08:16 AM, Gilles Gigan wrote: Hans, I have tested libv4lconvert with a PCI hauppauge hvr1300 DVB-T and found that v4lconvert_create() returns NULL. The

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim
Hello Guennadi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: Hello Guennadi, Reviewing your patch, I've got curious about a thing. I think your soc camera subsystem is covering multiple camera

Re: libv4l release: 0.5.97: the whitebalance release!

2009-04-16 Thread Hans de Goede
On 04/16/2009 08:16 AM, Gilles Gigan wrote: Hans, I have tested libv4lconvert with a PCI hauppauge hvr1300 DVB-T and found that v4lconvert_create() returns NULL. The problem comes from the shm_open calls in v4lcontrol_create() in libv4lcontrol.c (lines 187 190). libv4lconvert constructs the

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: Hello Guennadi, Reviewing your patch, I've got curious about a thing. I think your soc camera subsystem is covering multiple camera devices(sensors) in one target board, but if that is true I'm afraid I'm confused how to handle them

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: Hello Guennadi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: Hello Guennadi, Reviewing your patch, I've got curious about a thing. I

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim
Hi Guennadi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: Hello Guennadi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: My concern is all about the logical thing. Why can't we open device node even if it is not opened from any other process. The answer is of course because the other node is currently active, but I can understand the sort of confusion that the

Re: [linux-dvb] DVB-T USB dib0700 device recomendations?

2009-04-16 Thread hermann pitton
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 16.04.2009, 18:14 +1000 schrieb covert covert: Thats wierd. So the usb controler on the Nova-TD and the host controler on the SB700 are incompatible? I tried a few different USB tuners with a SB700 based motherboard until I found out the drivers where not up to

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: My concern is all about the logical thing. Why can't we open device node even if it is not opened from any other process. The answer is of course because the other node is currently active, but I can understand the sort of confusion that

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim
Hello Guennadi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: My concern is all about the logical thing. Why can't we open device node even if it is not opened from any other process. The answer is of

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: Hello Guennadi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote: 3. you open videoX, one default camera gets activated immediately - not all applications issue S_INPUT, so, there has to be a default.

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: If you have mutually exclusive sources, then those should be implemented as one device with multiple inputs. There is really no difference between a TV capture driver that selects between a tuner and S-Video input, and a camera driver that selects

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo Kim wrote: And about camera client with several inputs question, I will say that almost every 3G UMTS phone has dual camera on it. And we can consider every 3G UMTS smart phones have dual camera on it with soc camera solution. No, sorry, this wasn't

Re: [PATCH 5/5] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-16 Thread Dongsoo Kim
2009. 04. 16, 오후 11:56, Guennadi Liakhovetski 작성: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo Kim wrote: And about camera client with several inputs question, I will say that almost every 3G UMTS phone has dual camera on it. And we can consider every 3G UMTS smart phones have dual camera on it with soc

Re: Some questions about mr97310 controls (continuing previous thread on mr97310a.c)

2009-04-16 Thread Thomas Kaiser
Hello Theodore My answers/comments inline . On 04/16/2009 01:59 AM, Theodore Kilgore wrote: Thomas, A few questions in the text below. On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Thomas Kaiser wrote: Hello Theodore kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Thomas Kaiser wrote: As to the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-16 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Robert Jarzmik robert.jarz...@free.fr writes: I need to make some additionnal tests with I2C loading/unloading, but otherwise it works perfectly for (soc_camera / pxa_camera /mt9m111 combination). Guennadi, I made some testing, and there is something I don't understand in the new device

Re: RFC on proposed patches to mr97310a.c for gspca and v4l

2009-04-16 Thread Theodore Kilgore
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Kyle Guinn wrote: On Wednesday 04 March 2009 02:41:05 Thomas Kaiser wrote: Hello Theodore kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: Also, after the byte indicator for the compression algorithm there are some more bytes, and these almost definitely contain information which

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Robert Jarzmik wrote: Robert Jarzmik robert.jarz...@free.fr writes: I need to make some additionnal tests with I2C loading/unloading, but otherwise it works perfectly for (soc_camera / pxa_camera /mt9m111 combination). Guennadi, I made some testing, and there

[cron job] v4l-dvb daily build 2.6.22 and up: ERRORS, 2.6.16-2.6.21: ERRORS

2009-04-16 Thread Hans Verkuil
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for the kernels and architectures in the list below. Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb: date:Thu Apr 16 19:00:03 CEST 2009 path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb changeset: 11516:6ce311bdeee0 gcc version: gcc

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-16 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes: - I unload and reload mt9m111 and pxa_camera = not any better Actually, I think, in this case it should be found again, as long as you reload pxa-camera while i2c-pxa is already loaded. Damn, you're right. I cross-checked, and

soc-camera to v4l2-subdev conversion

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
operations, but there are still quite a few extra bonds that tie camera drivers and soc-camera core, that have to be broken. The current diff is at http://download.open-technology.de/testing/20090416-4.gitdiff, although, you, probably, don't want to look at it:-) A couple of minor general

Re: [RFC] Making Samsung S3C64XX camera interface driver in SoC camera subsystem

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: Hello, I'm planing to make a new camera interface driver for S3C64XX from Samsung. Even if it already has a driver, it seems to be re-designed for some reasons. If you are interested in, take a look at following repository

Re: Some questions about mr97310 controls (continuing previous thread on mr97310a.c)

2009-04-16 Thread Theodore Kilgore
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Thomas Kaiser wrote: Hello Theodore My answers/comments inline . Mine, too. I will also cut out some currently non-interesting parts, in the interest of saving space. On 04/16/2009 01:59 AM, Theodore Kilgore wrote: Thomas, A few questions in the text

Re: RFC on proposed patches to mr97310a.c for gspca and v4l

2009-04-16 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Thursday 16 April 2009 13:22:11 Theodore Kilgore wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Kyle Guinn wrote: On Wednesday 04 March 2009 02:41:05 Thomas Kaiser wrote: Hello Theodore kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: Also, after the byte indicator for the compression algorithm there are some

Re: [REVIEW] v4l2 loopback

2009-04-16 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:04:50 +0200 Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it wrote: On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:53:00 +0300 vas...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote: The issue I see is that the V4L drivers are meant to